Tiles in 1.3.9

ix="tiles"%> baseLayout my top and bottom layout jsps are just sample texted files... can any one help me where i have made any mistakes... thanks Balaji.M -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tiles-in-1.3.9-tp16483416p16483416.html

Re: Tiles in 1.3.9

2008/4/4, balaji.m.cs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: path must begin with a "/" What's the path that you are calling? Antonio

Re: Tiles in 1.3.9

Hi, > > > > > tiles-defs.xml There is good practice to start Tiles definitions with dot -> .tiles-defs I don't see ant forwards in your struts-config.xml, could you past them here? Regards -- Lukasz http://www.linkedin.com/in/lukaszlenart

Re: Tiles in 1.3.9

2008/4/4, Lukasz Lenart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > forward=".tiles-defs"/> > > > > > > tiles-defs.xml > > Good catch Lukasz! Now I remember that: *Struts-Tiles does not support forward actions, only forwards inside normal actions* Antonio

Re: Tiles in 1.3.9

g.xml, could you past them > here? > > > Regards > -- > Lukasz > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/lukaszlenart > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: Tiles in 1.3.9

dont you think it would be better practice naming tiles like this: tile.def (*.def are like .jsp but virtual pages) and only class tiles should be named with dot first like this .class-name? i point the issue by myself. the main issue is i have not given the in struts-config.xml. after i giv

Re: Tiles in 1.3.9

2008/4/4, Mihai Scripca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > dont you think it would be better practice naming tiles like this: > tile.def (*.def are like .jsp but virtual pages) > > and only class tiles should be named with dot first like this .class-name? Well, there is no guideline/best practice defined