Re: Trafodion Runtime Security

2016-02-11 Thread Gunnar Tapper
I'll bite. Do the traditional Posix bits work under Trafodion? Gunnar On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Qifan Chen wrote: > Should we also briefly mention if the traditional Posix permission bits > does/does not work under trafodion? > > thanks --Qifan > > On Wed, Feb 10,

Re: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Gunnar Tapper
Hi, I suggest that we limit the number of colors used. A simple change: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxlwNhWxn8iTT3NNMTZ0dmhqQm8 Thanks, Gunnar On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Trina Krug wrote: > Option 4!! > > Trina > > On Feb 11, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carol Pearson

RE: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Dave Birdsall
Hi, I like the font for option 4 (perhaps lower cased as Hans mentioned), but with the placement of option 6. That said, either one is fine. Dave *From:* Eric Owhadi [mailto:eric.owh...@esgyn.com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:02 PM *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org

RE: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Sandhya Sundaresan
I am not able to paste it here and preserve the font. But on the website, http://trafodion.apache.org/, the Trafodion on the top left upper corner in red has a lowercase font with the ‘F’ going down. We could try that to see if it looks better than 4 which is already pretty close/popular.

RE: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Wei-Shiun Tsai
+1 for Dave’s and Hans’ suggestion. Like the dragon to sit on the right, not on top of Trafodion. But the font in #4 looks more professional (perhaps also in lower case). Weishiun *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:04 PM *To:*

Re: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Atanu Mishra
I like Hans' suggestion for lower-case letters for Trafodion. Both options were better than the previous, but not quite there. Getting close. Regards, Atanu Atanu Mishra On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Eric Owhadi wrote: > +1 option 4 > > > >

RE: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Sandhya Sundaresan
Perhaps we should try and see how lowercase with both placements look. The dragon on top looks better to many. We can take votes again J *From:* Wei-Shiun Tsai [mailto:wei-shiun.t...@esgyn.com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:13 PM *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org *Subject:* RE:

Re: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Carol Pearson
Slightly late to the party, but +1 on option 4 as well. Though I would prefer a slightly less formal font, the one in option 6 is too spaced out and I'm not fond of it overall... But that's really a nit and this is infinitely better than no logo at all Thanks Ken! -Carol P.

Re: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Enis Söztutar
Option 4 looks good. The other one is not "serious" enough for my taste. Just my 2 cents. Enis On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Carol Pearson wrote: > Slightly late to the party, but +1 on option 4 as well. Though I would > prefer a slightly less formal font, the

Re: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Gunnar Tapper
Neither. Keep the font the same for Apache and Trafodion. Bold them both. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan < sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote: > Perhaps we should try and see how lowercase with both placements look. The > dragon on top looks better to many. We can take

Re: Logo Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Trina Krug
Option 4!! Trina > On Feb 11, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carol Pearson wrote: > > Slightly late to the party, but +1 on option 4 as well. Though I would > prefer a slightly less formal font, the one in option 6 is too spaced out and > I'm not fond of it overall... > >