Option 4!! Trina
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carol Pearson <carol.pearson...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Slightly late to the party, but +1 on option 4 as well. Though I would > prefer a slightly less formal font, the one in option 6 is too spaced out and > I'm not fond of it overall... > > But that's really a nit and this is infinitely better than no logo at all.... > > > Thanks Ken! > > -Carol P. > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Email: carol.pearson...@gmail.com > Twitter: @CarolP222 > --------------------------------------------------------------- > >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Neither. Keep the font the same for Apache and Trafodion. Bold them both. >> >>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan >>> <sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote: >>> Perhaps we should try and see how lowercase with both placements look. The >>> dragon on top looks better to many. We can take votes again J >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Wei-Shiun Tsai [mailto:wei-shiun.t...@esgyn.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:13 PM >>> >>> >>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: Logo Proposal >>> >>> >>> +1 for Dave’s and Hans’ suggestion. Like the dragon to sit on the right, >>> not on top of Trafodion. But the font in #4 looks more professional >>> (perhaps also in lower case). >>> >>> >>> >>> Weishiun >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:04 PM >>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: Logo Proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I like the font for option 4 (perhaps lower cased as Hans mentioned), but >>> with the placement of option 6. >>> >>> >>> >>> That said, either one is fine. >>> >>> >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Eric Owhadi [mailto:eric.owh...@esgyn.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:02 PM >>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: Logo Proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 option 4 >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Anuradha Hegde [mailto:anuradha.he...@esgyn.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 4:57 PM >>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: Logo Proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 option 4 >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:51 PM >>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Logo Proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Seems like the dragon logo itself is a winner - most everyone liked that. >>> >>> But the combined logo and name was definitely not popular. >>> >>> >>> >>> Here are a couple of new suggestions for the combined logo and name. >>> >>> >>> >>> Option 4 >>> >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4T3o3YVBDakNtQkU/view?usp=sharing >>> >>> >>> >>> Option 6 >>> >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y082OHhNNXBwazA/view?usp=sharing >>> >>> >>> >>> Don't ask for options 1-3, & 5 - they didn't make it passed my limited >>> field testing! >>> >>> Comments on 4 & 6? >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, Ken >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan >>> <sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote: >>> >>> I’d say there is enough “curliness” going on with the dragon. So we could >>> try with a simple bold font . Perhaps with an outline of a different color >>> like Hadoop’s/Mahouts is and tie it in with the dragon’s colors as well. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Hans Zeller [mailto:hans.zel...@esgyn.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 3:46 PM >>> >>> >>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Logo Proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 for the dragon as well. We used to have an informal logo with another >>> somewhat cursive font, it shows in one of the carousel pictures on the >>> trafodion.apache.org site. That might be better (although still not my >>> favorite). >>> >>> >>> >>> Hans >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Ken Holt <knhknhknh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> By the way, the size of the example logo is arbitrary. The original is a >>> vector graphics file that will scale up or down with no loss of quality, >>> which I will make available when the debate has settled on something. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'll make a stab at changing the font and size relative to the dragon and >>> post another version of that. >>> >>> >>> >>> Agree that separating the dragon from the name/font makes sense. >>> >>> Cheers, Ken >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >>> >>> +1 on dragon. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Carol Pearson <carol.pearson...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 on the Dragon!!! Looks great! >>> >>> >>> >>> On the writing, cursive is hard to read, so I'm up for replacing it >>> separately. Maybe we vote on each separately (as Sandhya and Amanda did)? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Voting separately is a good idea. Having engineers vote on 'designs' is >>> always a tough one. Sounds like folks like the dragon but not the >>> cursive... so suggest splitting out what we vote on so at least the dragon >>> carries. >>> >>> >>> >>> St.Ack >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -Carol P. >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Email: carol.pearson...@gmail.com >>> >>> Twitter: @CarolP222 >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Sandhya Sundaresan >>> <sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for Dragon. >>> >>> The Trafodion cursive writing and color -1. IMHO we need to rework the >>> writing for sure and try various colors. It’s looking cluttered and >>> complicated with the cursive. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Amanda Moran [mailto:amanda.mo...@esgyn.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 10:13 AM >>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Logo Proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> +10 for dragon! Very cute! >>> >>> >>> >>> Not a huge fan of the cursive writing myself... but if everyone else >>> likes... I give it a +0 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Christophe LeRouzo <c...@esgyn.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Ken, the standalone dragon looks really good. It complements really >>> well the yellow elephant! >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -clr >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:53 AM >>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: Logo Proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I like both. I do agree that the font for “Trafodion” makes a’s and o’s too >>> much alike. Would be nice to switch to another font that doesn’t have that >>> issue. >>> >>> >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:48 AM >>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Logo Proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> >>> >>> Apache Trafodion needs a logo. >>> >>> >>> >>> I believe there was some discussion about a logo for Trafodion quite some >>> time ago, but we never really resolved it. In the very early days of >>> Trafodion, before becoming an Apache project (incubating) I devised a logo >>> that leveraged the Welsh connection of the project name, and that was a >>> simple cute dragon. >>> >>> >>> >>> I now have a much improved version of that original logo and propose that >>> we use this as the official Trafodion logo going forward. >>> >>> >>> >>> Dragon standalone - >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4QmttYnBzZDdFSTQ/view?usp=sharing >>> >>> Trafodion name & dragon - >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y3RRdVQwb0owSFU/view?usp=sharing >>> >>> >>> >>> I’m not thrilled with the font choice for “Trafodion” – the o’s and a’s >>> look too similar. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thoughts? Should we vote on this? >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, Ken >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Amanda Moran >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> >> Gunnar >> If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right. >
