Hello,
I have been using Ruta a lot lately, and it has made me much more
productive. Thanks to all the people that contributed to it!
I have been thinking about two small syntax simplifications and was
wondering if they would make sense:
A) Types declarations (2.5.1)
// Types with features may
Hi,
short answer: It makes sense :-)
There are maybe some problems in the grammars concerning types and
variables vs external actions, but I think it's worth the trouble.
Can you create a jira issue for it? I will take care of it then.
Best,
Peter
PS: You can of course also submit a patch
Ohh!!! I misunderstand this. I thought this would scale my Aggregate and
AEs both.
I want to scale aggregate as well as individual AEs. Is there any way of
doing this in UIMA AS/DUCC?
On 04/28/2015 07:14 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
In async aggregate you scale individual AEs not the
Hi,
I was trying to scale my processing pipeline to be run in DUCC
environment with uima as process_dd. If I was trying to scale using the
below given configuration, the threads started were not as expected:
analysisEngineDeploymentDescription
