Hi Jakob!
I don't think so. 4 years ago Eddie wrote:
The only way to do this now is to create a 2nd CAS, copy over the
parts wanted using the org.apache.uima.util.CasCopier and serialize
the new CAS.
See
http://uima.markmail.org/message/htkrx4rpfagsx7tr?q=serializing+view#query:serializing%20vi
Hello Erik,
in Lucene 4.9 (maybe earlier), you can replace the Lucene analyzer
with a UIMA pipeline. At least the docs say so. I don't know how good
it is becaus I've never used it.
Cheers,
Armin
On 8/26/14, Erik Fäßler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> actually, I don't use LuCas anymore to write a Lucene
Hi!
I tried to do the introductory example for DKpro. But DKpro's
StanfordNamedEntityRecognizer throws a ClassCastException. Any ideas?
I had to replace some code snippets with [...].
Thanks
Armin
Jul 24, 2014 9:27:42 AM
de.tudarmstadt.ukp.dkpro.core.api.resources.ResourceObjectProviderBase
loa
lieve Ruta has the concept of limiting rules to certain context
> annotation types, but I do not know if that also works when external
> AEs are invoked.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 12.06.2014, at 12:00, Dr. Armin Wegner
> wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>&g
Hi Richard,
sounds good, but, honestly, that's too much Java EE for me. I'm
willing to try it, but I maybe won't understand it. It would be great
if you could provide a typical and complete example to use and modify
for similar tasks.
Thank you,
Armin
On 6/13/14, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrot
Hello!
Is there an UIMA component which restricts an aggregated analysis
engine to a substring of the document text or to mentions of a given
annotation type? That is, is there a UIMA aquivalent to GATE's Segment
Processing PR?
Thanks,
Armin
Hello!
Is there an UIMA component which restricts an aggregated analysis
engine to a substring of the document text or to mentions of a given
annotation type? That is, is there a UIMA aquivalent to GATE's Segment
Processing PR?
Thanks,
Armin
ssibility, though. The other thing that people
> sometimes do is to store map data in external resources, which can be
> shared
> among co-located Annotators (running in the same JVM).
>
> -Marshall
> On 10/16/2013 11:55 AM, Dr. Armin Wegner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'
Looks good, I will try it.
Thank you,
Armin
On 10/17/13, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> You could also use the entrySet which gives you all the key/value pairs.
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 17.10.2013, at 16:43, wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> thanks for your answer. Using HashMap, does the n-th ele
rote:
> Hi,
>
> you could define a feature structure e.g.
>
> StringStringMapEntry {
> String key
> String value
> }
>
> and store these in an FSList. Then, write additional convenience code around
> that
> which transforms this to/from a Map.
>
> -- Richard
&g
Hi,
I'd like to have a type feature that is a list of key-value pairs. The
number of pairs is unknown. What's best for this? Is it even possible?
Thanks,
Armin
> Yes, is optional, but applications that use the information typically treat
> -1 as "unknown"
>
> ~Burn
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Renaud Richardet
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Armin,
>> Just return null. I rarely implement that method...
>> Best
What to return from method Progress of CasCollectionReader_ImplBase
when I do not know the total number of artifacts?
13 matches
Mail list logo