s are now part of the trunk.
RegExpRuleTest.ruta contains an example and the documentation describes the
exact syntax.
Best,
Peter
On 08.05.2013 17:56, William Karl Thompson wrote:
> Many thanks!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
>
,
Peter
On 08.05.2013 04:38, William Karl Thompson wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> What you proposed would work fine for what I was trying to do!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
> Sent: Tuesday
06.05.2013 18:26, William Karl Thompson wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I like the simplified regular expression rule syntax -- very handy. It's
> almost exactly what I wanted. However, one thing I'm wondering is how to
> create an annotation with features using such rules. I have in m
> 1 = CREATE(FooType, "feat" = "bar");
Here's a possible variant of the above that I can imagine would be useful too:
"(regex) (string)" -> CREATE(FooType, "feat1" = GROUP(1), "feat2"=GROUP(2));
What are your thoughts on this?
Chee
Vielen Dank, Ich werde es probieren.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 12:42 PM
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: Re: Extending TextMarker with new actions
Am 02.05.2013 19:16, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
> I
f the type T1 for each match of the complete regular
expression and an annotation
of the type T2 for each match of the first capturing
group.
Am 02.05.2013 19:06, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
> I forgot to mention, the numeric argument in the proposed M
I forgot to mention, the numeric argument in the proposed MARKREGEXP action
indicates which capturing group is to be used from regular expression to
generate the region for the annotation of the specified type.
-Original Message-
From: William Karl Thompson
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013
ctions
Hi,
Am 29.04.2013 20:22, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I've updated and built the TextMarker projects, but now I'm spinning my
> wheels a bit trying to install the updated TextMarker Workbench feature from
> the projects. Could you give me a tip o
01.05.2013 04:57, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with the cTAKES pipeline to annotate some clinical text. The
> cTAKES syntactic chunker generates overlapping and nested annotations with
> the same syntactic type. For example:
>
> [NP ascending [NP colon
Hi,
I'm working with the cTAKES pipeline to annotate some clinical text. The cTAKES
syntactic chunker generates overlapping and nested annotations with the same
syntactic type. For example:
[NP ascending [NP colon polyps]]
What I would like to do is to use TextMarker rules to eliminate nested
eter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 4:21 PM
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: Re: Extending TextMarker with new actions
Hi,
Am 29.04.2013 20:22, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I've updated and built the TextMarker projects, but now I'
ot having much success at the moment.
Many thanks,
Will
-Original Message-
From: William Karl Thompson
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 3:40 PM
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: RE: Extending TextMarker with new actions
Hi Peter,
Thanks very much, I will try this out!
Best,
Will
-O
here are some small bugs, but they will be fixed tomorrow.
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> Am 25.04.2013 11:37, schrieb Peter Klügl:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 25.04.2013 03:29, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> (My apologies, I mistakenly se
ll be fixed tomorrow.
Best,
Peter
Am 25.04.2013 11:37, schrieb Peter Klügl:
> Hi,
>
> Am 25.04.2013 03:29, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
>> Hello,
>>
>> (My apologies, I mistakenly sent this to the dev list initially)
>>
>> I'm very interested in using t
Hello,
(My apologies, I mistakenly sent this to the dev list initially)
I'm very interested in using the TextMarker project, but the current set of
action types doesn't quite do what I need. I found references to an extension
mechanism, have also found the ITextMarkerActionExtension interface i
15 matches
Mail list logo
