Hi,
Am 29.08.2019 um 15:34 schrieb Dominik Terweh:
> Hey,
>
> I tried to understand the rules that you suggested and have a few questions
> (see below).
> What we have (successfully) implemented so far is a set of rules that change
> the value of the stored string, in order to produce some kind
Hey,
I tried to understand the rules that you suggested and have a few questions
(see below).
What we have (successfully) implemented so far is a set of rules that change
the value of the stored string, in order to produce some kind of expression
that is evaluated subsequently:
a) replace numbe
Hi,
we are using a separate component for dictionary lookup, which can
combine multiple dictionaries and can also assign arbitrary feature
values. Most language-dependent information is extracted to
language-specific dictionaries and some language independent
dictionaries. There is a ticket to co
Hi Peter,
>From *your* perspective, for this particular task of turning written out
numbers to their numerical representation, what would be better to
implement it as a language extension (= one additional function) or a set
of ruta rules?
Against language extension speaks the fact that such conve
Hi,
we (Averbis) have an annotator which does exactly what you describe, but
unfortunetly I cannot share it. However, I can tell that the annotator
is almost completely implemented in Ruta and uses no Ruta language
extensions.
If you want to learn more about language extensions, then there are
Dear All,
When working with German written out numbers I figured, that in order to get
what I want (the numeric value of a written number) I need to either hard code
every single number name and use Wordtable or I need to work with the string.
However, this made me thinking that this would prob
