Is the following a legal config in the dao.xml? iBATIS 2.2.0 allows this
initialization (i.e. no XML barfing), but I the first DB access (relating to
the order/sql-map-config.xml) when I use this construct gives me a There is no
statement named 'findOrderBy...' in this SqlMap...
I'm trying to
Hi Mark,
I believe the .ppt will be available on indyjug.net sometime soon.
I've slept since the presentation, so I can't remember how much was
included in the slide show and how much was oral elaboration.
Thanks for the link to your Abator page, but unfortunately it's coming
up blank for me
Hi,
I'm leaning towards the no-way-in-the-world-would-this-work
configuration :) I think you should specify only one transactionManager
element and include all SqlMaps from there. See the developers guide
(from the website) for some samples.
Niels
-Original Message-
From: Dave
Having examined the DTD, it's actually illegal, but not enforced.
I have tried something new where I wrap each of the txMgr nodes in their own
context, but without specifying their IDs...That's not working so hot either
under transaction management.
Oh well,
-D
-Original Message-
Thank you. I thought so. Can anyone comment on c3p0 vs. dbcp? Is either
one considered to be better/faster than the other? Or better in some usage
models than others?
On 2/28/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Absolutely. You can use any DataSource implementation you like. All
I sent the demo code and the presentation to Brice this afternoon (after the
great gmail outage today). I assume it will make it to the indyjug.net web
site shortly.
I really enjoyed my time at the Indy Java user's group! I was glad to have
the opportunity to meet more people in the community
