On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Please test the attached patch, worksForMe now.
Works for me too. Thanks!
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Are you sure that you are using a raw 2.6.15-rc7?
>
> He has disabled SKAS, which is causing this - however the breakage doesn't
> see
> -Original Message-
> > My kernel does not support modules -> easier upgrades, just
> compile and
> > edit a symlink than powercycle. its more secure too.
> because I have some
> > users with root rights in their uml`s, so they could in
> theory (if they
> > were smart and evil) compile
Today I decided to run a 64-bit uml_moo (a local version, where I had . I did
a non destructive merge, and tried to boot the FS.
The result was various errors when booting on it (tons of corruptions); I ran
e2fsck on it (from the host) and it spit out hundreds of screenfuls of
errors.
So my re
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 18:48, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > On 12/25/05, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please do give it a try, and if you have any issues/regressions,
> >
> > send out
> >
> > > a note (even if you sent one earlier) so that we don't forget about
> >
> > it.
> >
>
> On 12/25/05, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please do give it a try, and if you have any issues/regressions,
> send out
> > a note (even if you sent one earlier) so that we don't forget about
> it.
>
> Hmm. Somebody broke UML compile for my config again...
Are you sure that you ar
On 12/25/05, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please do give it a try, and if you have any issues/regressions, send out
> a note (even if you sent one earlier) so that we don't forget about it.
Hmm. Somebody broke UML compile for my config again...
CC arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.
