Re: [uml-devel] Get a Diploma without the hassle!

2006-06-25 Thread Priscilla Cochran
In just 2 years you can have a masters degree from a national university. A better job, more income and a better life can all be yours in just 2 years. No books to buy, no classes to go to, and no entrance exams. Learn in your own home at your own pace. We supply all the study materials, a

Re: [uml-devel] problems compiling 2.6.17 against glibc 2.4

2006-06-25 Thread Nix
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] announced authoritatively: > On Wednesday 21 June 2006 21:38, Nix wrote: [jmp_buf goes hidden] >> This vile patch lets me compile but is almost certainly not good enough: >> however, I don't know what *is* good enough: now that glibc is blocking >> us from the

Re: [uml-devel] possible um l bug

2006-06-25 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 17:48, Jonathan wrote: > Message body follows: > I am using user-mode linux on 2.6.16.18 > I my .config everything is resident except some NFS >> CONFIG_NFS_FS=m > CONFIG_NFS_V3=y > CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y > CONFIG_NFS_V4=y > CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO=y >> CONFIG_NFSD=m > CONFIG_NF

Re: [uml-devel] problems compiling 2.6.17 against glibc 2.4

2006-06-25 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 21:38, Nix wrote: > The problem is that arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c > messes around inside a jmp_buf, and in glibc 2.4 the glibc > maintainers have helpfully removed the definitions that > let you poke around in there (they were only there for the > sake of one m