Tony wrote:
> It wouldn't hurt to have additional mirrors/backups of the data.
That, I can provide. I never realized that it was needed.
> Initially, we should identify a means for stopping the spam.
I may be able to help here.
I don't think my filters are any better than sf.net's, but seeing th
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:33:35 +0200
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again, about 4 month since last time (for lack of time) I'm sending for final
> review and for inclusion into -mm protection support for remap_file_pages (in
> short "RFP prot support"), i.e. setting per-pte protections
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:56:36PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Can anybody explain me how can we use REGPARM if we have to link with host
> glibc?
Umm, yeah, good point. This regparam behavior is different from the old
behavior, where regparam functions had to be declared as such.
However, thi
> -Original Message-
> However, since the wiki is privately hosted what happens if,
> for instance, the
> admin decides to close it because he doesn't support any more UML?
The same could be said for either Jeff or yourself.
It wouldn't hurt to have additional mirrors/backups of the dat
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] stipulated:
> I'm starting to get sick of udev - on Ubuntu currently I'm unable to compile
> a
> vanilla kernel that works (I must still do more complete tests but I'm
> already beyond the "I've misconfigured something" moment).
All udev needs is CONFIG_HO