Re: [uml-devel] User-mode-linux-devel Digest, Vol 3, Issue 35

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Martin
Tony wrote: > It wouldn't hurt to have additional mirrors/backups of the data. That, I can provide. I never realized that it was needed. > Initially, we should identify a means for stopping the spam. I may be able to help here. I don't think my filters are any better than sf.net's, but seeing th

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH RFP-V4 00/13] remap_file_pages protection support - 4th attempt

2006-08-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:33:35 +0200 Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, about 4 month since last time (for lack of time) I'm sending for final > review and for inclusion into -mm protection support for remap_file_pages (in > short "RFP prot support"), i.e. setting per-pte protections

Re: [uml-devel] arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S: useless #ifdef _REGPARM's?

2006-08-28 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:56:36PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > Can anybody explain me how can we use REGPARM if we have to link with host > glibc? Umm, yeah, good point. This regparam behavior is different from the old behavior, where regparam functions had to be declared as such. However, thi

Re: [uml-devel] Wiki situation (was: Re: [uml-user] 2.6.17.10)

2006-08-28 Thread Brock, Anthony - NET
> -Original Message- > However, since the wiki is privately hosted what happens if, > for instance, the > admin decides to close it because he doesn't support any more UML? The same could be said for either Jeff or yourself. It wouldn't hurt to have additional mirrors/backups of the dat

Re: [uml-devel] Strange behaviour in eth assignments

2006-08-28 Thread Nix
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] stipulated: > I'm starting to get sick of udev - on Ubuntu currently I'm unable to compile > a > vanilla kernel that works (I must still do more complete tests but I'm > already beyond the "I've misconfigured something" moment). All udev needs is CONFIG_HO