On Friday 06 March 2009 08:35:43 Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 07:18:34PM +0800, Am??rico Wang wrote:
> > It does work well x86_64, but my question is that whether this will
> > break i386 or not, since before, CONFIG_3_LEVEL_PGTABLES depends on
> > EXPERIMENTAL on i386, this patch rem
On Friday 06 March 2009 03:50:38 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 09:48, Américo Wang wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:42:14AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> >>Apparently, nobody other than me has ever attempted to use User Mode
> >> Linux built from 2.6.28 on x86-64, because i
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 07:18:34PM +0800, Am??rico Wang wrote:
> It does work well x86_64, but my question is that whether this will
> break i386 or not, since before, CONFIG_3_LEVEL_PGTABLES depends on
> EXPERIMENTAL on i386, this patch removes it.
As long as CONFIG_3_LEVEL_PGTABLES is off on 32-
uml uses a concatenated string literal to store the contents of .config,
but .config file content is varaible, it can be very long.
Use an array of string literals instead.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong
Cc: Jeff Dike
---
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/Makefile b/arch/um/kernel/Makefile
index 499e5e9.
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:51:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:50, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 09:48, Américo Wang wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:42:14AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
Apparently, nobody other than me has ever attempte
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:50, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 09:48, Américo Wang wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:42:14AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
>>>Apparently, nobody other than me has ever attempted to use User Mode Linux
>>>built from 2.6.28 on x86-64, because it does
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 09:48, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:42:14AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
>>Apparently, nobody other than me has ever attempted to use User Mode Linux
>>built from 2.6.28 on x86-64, because it doesn't work. It still doesn't work
>>in current git. I complain
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:42:14AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
>Apparently, nobody other than me has ever attempted to use User Mode Linux
>built from 2.6.28 on x86-64, because it doesn't work. It still doesn't work
>in current git. I complained about it not working back in January:
>
>http://sou
