[uml-devel] RE: Switching uml_utilities to public CVS and no-maintainer model

2005-03-09 Thread Steve Schmidtke
Blaisorblade wrote: Now, I'm thinking to move uml_utilities to a CVS repository, either the SourceForge one or the UML's own one. Ok... There are too much little things to fix to have a central maintainer, IMHO. And nobody volunteered, sadly, and I can't either. Is there really that much to fix? T

Re: [uml-devel] RE: uml_switch security fixing

2005-03-09 Thread Steve Schmidtke
not want my users to be able to set up slip devices on their own (why? I don't know, I'm just paranoid that way). Steve Schmidtke --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Pr

[uml-devel] RE: uml_switch security fixing

2005-03-06 Thread Steve Schmidtke
, and they are few)! Suggestions? Agreed, tuntap is a compile time option, slip should be as well. Steve Schmidtke uml_net-slip.diff Description: Binary data uml_net-uml.diff Description: Binary data

Re: [uml-devel] [local] [kill] uml-utilities 20030903 uml_net slip_down() fails

2004-12-15 Thread Steve Schmidtke
or 0 if it has already been set (not useful). Steve Schmidtke --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start

Re: [uml-devel] Re: What to do with uml_switch?

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Schmidtke
"switch_mon_tool" is unsuitable, it can be replaced by "vmon_switch" in a heartbeat -- without modifying or even restarting uml_switch. Steve Schmidtke --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest &

Re: [uml-devel] Re: What to do with uml_switch?

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Schmidtke
ion for testing. It would also be interesting if packets could be passed in shared memory. I'm wondering if it would be faster and more reliable at the same time. Steve Schmidtke --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read hones

Re: [uml-devel] Re: What to do with uml_switch?

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Schmidtke
sible if you wish to play packets that Linux simply can not easily produce. There is no reason you would need to use Linux as your packet source: cat tcpdump.pcap | switch_mon_tool --socket /tmp/uml.mon --delay 100ms is the type of functionality I'm shooting for

[uml-devel] Re: What to do with uml_switch?

2004-12-07 Thread Steve Schmidtke
physical hardware. I'm eating my own dog food (since I too suggested a monitor port), and I've coded up a framework for doing just that. I need to test it more before submitting a patch for review and comment. Steve Schmidtke --- SF e

[uml-devel] Re: What to do with uml_switch?

2004-12-07 Thread Steve Schmidtke
ml_switch. Add code to accept and generate arbitrary ethernet frames, add you now have an independant pluggable diagnostic tool anyone can use on the fly. This is a solution that would probably satisfy 95% of us mere mortals. Steve Schmidtke

[uml-devel] Re: What to do with uml_switch?

2004-12-05 Thread Steve Schmidtke
onitor socket. A hook to filter packets entering uml_switch and a new function to inject packets (with/without updating MAC tables) might be all that's necessary. All your traffic management and expect code could reside in the external mon

[uml-devel] RE: What to do with uml_switch?

2004-12-05 Thread Steve Schmidtke
I'd nominate myself, but I have no system that I can dedicate to the project. I also have a hard time saying no to interesting ideas. Steve Schmidtke --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews