> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 21:22:12 +0100
> From: Thomas Ledet - ComSupport Gruppen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Organization: ComSupport Gruppen
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [uml-user] Possibly networking/libc6 problem on 2.4.26 Debian
> rootstrapped syst
Sorry for the semi-crosspost, but I thought I'd finish out the thread from the
beginning of the month and give an update to those involved.
My method for causing the problem every time (example works under 2.6.9-ck3 and
2.6.10-rc2-bk7):
# mount tmpfs tmp/ -t tmpfs
# TMPDIR=./tmp/ /kernels/non-fix
Antoine,
maybe this isn`t a networking problem but a problem with the UML process itself
?
Keep in mind that a UML is a program which runs in userspace - and it`s no
realtime
application. So, under certain circumstances the response of that application
probably
could be slower than normal - e.g
Greetings to all. I would like to ask for your advice
regarding this question:
"In general, is the memcpy's performance on UML (User
Mode Linux) environment better than the host OS? If
that is the case, can you give the reason behind it
(ex. UML's architecture)?"
Here's the evironment:
HOST
OS
Blaisorblade wrote:
Well, complain against make-kpkg, or study its options better (don't know
which one). It shouldn't execute that line! But knowing Debian's quality, I
guess that you should just say it that you aren't building modules.
still working on which of those was the problem. My origina
Ever since upgrading to the 2.4.27-1 UML-applied-to-2.4.28 (from
2.4.24-2-applied-to-2.4.26), I've been seeing decidedly peculiar network
interaction.
Notably, the UML ceases responding to network packets for up to a minute
and a half at a time, then restarts again just as quietly: the
console-on
The patches for the latest skas3 are at the home of its maintainer:
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patchlist.html#2_6_host
In addition Jeff is working on skas4.
And Jeff posted an interesting skas-in-userspace patch to the list a
while back.
The latter two are not for production sys
Hi,
i got
the error while halting the system :
Sending all processes the TERM
signal... Kernel panic: read of switch_pipe failed, errno = 0sleeping
process 17672 got unexpected signal : 11
Plz
help me out to analyze it.
Thanks and Best Regards,Adil
Mujeeb
Hello Everyone,
I am developing an ip router that will run on a uml. Each uml could have many
ethernet
interfaces.
Before I launch my umls I like to wire some uml interfaces to other uml
interfaces, and some uml
interfaces to a host tap interface. Once the umls are up and running each
rout
What guest/host kernel versions are you running.
Jason
We the willing, led by the unknowning, are doing the impossible, for the
ungrateful. We have done so much, for so long, with so little. We are now
qualified to do anything with nothing.
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
i h
i tried to install debian sarge rc2 into an uml system. the host is
running a kernel 2.6.8-10 with applied skas patch from
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/skas3-2.6/host-skas3-2.6.7-v7.patch
(should be ok for 2.6.8 too, debian provied only patches till 2.6.7).
the uml kerne
Gérald Colangelo wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 21:22:12 +0100
From: Thomas Ledet - ComSupport Gruppen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: ComSupport Gruppen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [uml-user] Possibly networking/libc6 problem on 2.4.26 Debian
rootstrap
Hi!
I'm running 12 UML-s with nice level 1 (first 15). Inside the uml-s the
reaction time for a disk io is poor. Eg if I make apt-get install wget
it is about 5 minutes.
It is a RAID5 array, with adaptec 2120S scsi raid controller, 3
(1rpm) disk-s in the raid array.
The host system is respon
Yep, I realised after I sent it,
my packets were dropped when I had something I thought was similar.
Sorry for the noise.
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 01:01 +, Nix wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Antoine Martin spake:
> > Looks to me like this is a routing problem, check your arp tables and
> > your r
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Antoine Martin spake:
> Looks to me like this is a routing problem, check your arp tables and
> your routes. It may be that something is occasionally causing a packet
> to come out of the wrong interface/wrong mac, which confuses the lower
> network layers.
Alas, I don't think
On Friday 17 December 2004 00:30, alex katebi wrote:
> So should I do ubd16= in kernel command arg ? then do fdsik /dev/ubd16 ?
No, you still get /dev/ubd1 and ubd1=, but you must do:
rm /dev/ubd1
mknod /dev/ubd1 b maj min
where maj is the current one (IIRC 98) and min is 16.
You should recreate
On Saturday 11 December 2004 19:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm continuing to find the 2.6.8.1 w/ ska3-v7 host and 2.6.9 w/ bb4 very
> stable. However, now that I've gotten beyond, what I consider,
> infrastructure problems, I'm seeing behavior I don't understand.
> I'm specifically investigat
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 04:46, alex katebi wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I tried to install the Slackware 10.0 into a uml root file system using
> your slackware tool kit. When I did the "fdisk /dev/ubd1" command. I got an
> error message: "unable to open /dev/ubd1".
>
> Thanks,
> Alex Katebi
> Hey gang, I may have missed the response earlier,
you have
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=user-mode-linux-user&w=2&r=1&s=NPTL&q=b
> but is UML
> incompatible with NPTL on a Host, Guest or both OS?
the guest cannot use NPTL.
The host can have NPTL installed, and AFAIK later (not yet released?)
Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
On Sunday 12 December 2004 21:22, Thomas Ledet - ComSupport Gruppen wrote:
After setting up a UML system using "rootstrap" in Debian Unstable
I get the following problems:
- running "$ host " freezes the system.
Well, somebody had this too, but I don't remember it getting sol
On Saturday 11 December 2004 15:05, Franck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a debian sarge FS UML who's 3 Go and a cow related to the UML FS.
>
> Is it possible to resize the COW without touch the UML FS ?
> I'm searching for having a minimal FS UML size (~ 300Mo) and
> resizing/defining ONLY the COW
>
> Rega
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 10:35, firnnauriel wrote:
> In general, is there a correlation between the number
> of page faults occurred in the system and bcopy's
> performance? If the page fault is high, will the
> bcopy's performance become slower?
> Kindly enlighten me
> on this. If you can p
On Sunday 12 December 2004 21:22, Thomas Ledet - ComSupport Gruppen wrote:
> After setting up a UML system using "rootstrap" in Debian Unstable
> I get the following problems:
>
> - running "$ host " freezes the system.
Well, somebody had this too, but I don't remember it getting solved... maybe
t
On Saturday 11 December 2004 13:42, Adil Mujeeb, Noida wrote:
> hi,
> Iam facing a problem. Iam able to successfully boot the UML but when i try
> to login on it, it generates an error:
> Kernel panic: Kernel mode fault at addr 0xc, ip 0xa0115924
>
> Could anybody plz help me out what is the probl
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 06:31, firnnauriel wrote:
> Greetings to all. I would like to ask for your advice
> regarding this question:
> "In general, is the memcpy's performance on UML (User
> Mode Linux) environment better than the host OS? If
> that is the case, can you give the reason behind i
On Monday 13 December 2004 16:46, Hegedus Gabor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm running 12 UML-s with nice level 1 (first 15). Inside the uml-s the
> reaction time for a disk io is poor. Eg if I make apt-get install wget
> it is about 5 minutes.
> It is a RAID5 array, with adaptec 2120S scsi raid controller,
> Notably, the UML ceases responding to network packets for up to a minute
> and a half at a time, then restarts again just as quietly: the
> console-on-network-port freezes at the same time. The UML continues
> running and packets get queued on either side of the... blockage, and
> are allowed thr
Our antivirus software has detected the following potentially malicious
programs in an email from your address.
Worm/NetSky.P worm
The email was not delivered.
Your computer may be infected! Please install or upgrade your virusscanner ASAP
Mail-Info:
--8<--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
28 matches
Mail list logo
