On Friday 07 July 2006 03:34, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:20:16PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > 1) I mount /home with hostfs using the following line in fstab:
> >none /home hostfs /home,rw 0 0
> >
> > df shows:
> >
> > none 10413255443693385415481253412470784
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 10:50, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > "Jim" == Jim Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jim> Please forgive me for interpreting without suggesting how to fix,
> Jim> but the interpretation might be useful. Is there any chance of
> Jim> trying out the 2.6.16 UML kernel on a
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:13:33PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
> Would it also fix the hangs of the entire UML? I've just had two more of
> those.
Maybe, that is the symptom.
> Let me know if you want me to test something. Otherwise, I'll wait until
> something shows up in the mainline (which might
> "Jeff" == Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:11:00PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
>> I didn't capture that... I've been trying to reproduce the problem,
>> but for some reason I can't, even though it happened quite often
>> before.
Jeff> Actually, I just
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:11:00PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
> I didn't capture that... I've been trying to reproduce the problem, but
> for some reason I can't, even though it happened quite often before.
Actually, I just found and fixed a bug which could cause this.
Unfortunately, the patch is
> > rt_sigreturn(0x722bda19)= 1915476513
> > --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) @ 0 (0) ---
> > rt_sigreturn(0x722bda19)= 1915476513
> > [... this goes on until there is enough "movement" in another TTY ...]
>
> But what happens here when there is movement elsewhere?
I didn
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:38:05AM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
> Since it seems to be a known issue, perhaps it's worth documenting it on
> the web site -- I wouldn't have used hostfs if I knew it could mean
> stale data for UML (the information is probably in there somewhere, but
> I missed it).
OK
> "Jeff" == Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:20:16PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
>> 1) I mount /home with hostfs using the following line in fstab:
>> none /home hostfs /home,rw 0 0
>>
>> df shows:
>>
>> none 10413255443693385415481253412470784
>> 104
> "Jeff" == Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:20:16PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
>> 1) I mount /home with hostfs using the following line in fstab:
>> none /home hostfs /home,rw 0 0
>>
>> df shows:
>>
>> none 10413255443693385415481253412470784
>> 104
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:20:16PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
> 1) I mount /home with hostfs using the following line in fstab:
>none /home hostfs /home,rw 0 0
>
> df shows:
>
> none 10413255443693385415481253412470784
> 10413248933519167673017998136836096 47190722440083771496
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:20:16PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
> 1) I mount /home with hostfs using the following line in fstab:
>none /home hostfs /home,rw 0 0
>
> df shows:
>
> none 10413255443693385415481253412470784
> 10413248933519167673017998136836096 47190722440083771496
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:28:22AM -0700, Jim Carter wrote:
> Please forgive me for interpreting without suggesting how to fix, but the
> interpretation might be useful. Is there any chance of trying out the
> 2.6.16 UML kernel on a 2.6.16 host? Version skew, particularly backwards,
> is very
> "Jim" == Jim Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jim> Please forgive me for interpreting without suggesting how to fix,
Jim> but the interpretation might be useful. Is there any chance of
Jim> trying out the 2.6.16 UML kernel on a 2.6.16 host? Version skew,
Jim> particularly backwards, i
Please forgive me for interpreting without suggesting how to fix, but the
interpretation might be useful. Is there any chance of trying out the
2.6.16 UML kernel on a 2.6.16 host? Version skew, particularly backwards,
is very plausible as an explanation for all of these. Also be sure that
th
I've just tried the linux-2.6.16 binary UML kernel from the new web
site, together with a guest ubuntu installation. Looks good at a first
glance, but I've hit several problems:
1) I mount /home with hostfs using the following line in fstab:
none /home hostfs /home,rw 0 0
df shows:
none
15 matches
Mail list logo
