Mixing ActiveMQ Versions

2007-05-07 Thread Juergen Mayrbaeurl
Can I use an ActiveMQ Message Broker running under version 4.1.0 with a JMS application using version 4.1.1? Our JMS consumer application always crashes after loosing the connection to the broker with an Out Of Memory exception (Memory leak in connection factory). Kind regards Juergen -- View

Re: .Net support for CPP client

2007-05-07 Thread Bill.E
This may be ot. There were compiler bugs in VS 2003. We had a big todo about compiling boost into managed C++ with similar errors that you are getting here. The end result was try again using the new compiler in VS 2005 which worked. There are a whole host of bugs in template expansion,

Re: OutOfMemoryError using 4.1.1

2007-05-07 Thread Justin C. van Vorst
What is the correct number of file descriptors necessary to not have ActiveMQ fail in a production environment? James.Strachan wrote: It might be you are just running out of threads; maybe your setting of file descriptors per process is too low? On 4/23/07, Justin C. van Vorst [EMAIL

Javascript - JmsReplyTo(TemporaryDestination) - JSONP

2007-05-07 Thread northshorefiend
Say you have a widget on a webpage. The user clicks 'send' and expects a 'synchronous' response. You could just register a listener with amq.js and wait asynchronously for a reply. But the user complains it is not fast enough. So what about using the JSONP idea to contact the server outside of

Broker Pipeline

2007-05-07 Thread Banana Man
Hi All, I am looking for some advice on using the broker for a pipeline of components (http://activemq.apache.org/camel/pipes-and-filters.html). A couple of pre-requisites of the pipeline are: 1) the processing components should not have any knowledge of their position in the pipeline so that

Re: Message Groups

2007-05-07 Thread James Strachan
On 5/7/07, Banana Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Is it possible to configure the broker to dynamically attach a message group to an incoming message based on the content of that message (e.g. an xpath or selector)? Interesting idea :) You could use a Broker Interceptor to do such a

Re: Message Groups

2007-05-07 Thread Banana Man
Thanks for your help. I was thinking that the interceptors might be a good idea. I like the idea of the responsibility being in the broker because, you could argue, it is the broker and not the client that should concern itself with HA and load balancing etc. The Transformer on the Producer

Bug but I do not know where ?

2007-05-07 Thread Daniel Gradecak
Hello, I am using a lot of different softwares (liferay/james/activemq ...) and for un uknown reason right now the JVM is crashing ... I have a lot of threads, but I doubt it craches because of that without giving any reasons. I am posting it here because I saw in the log Current thread