On Feb 12, 2008, at 5:40 AM, amq-newbie wrote:
I'm completely new to the activemq, so I guess my question is basic.
I am using activemq for JUnit testing. Therefore, I set to run it in
vm mode
since JUnit is ran by third party product that executes unit tests for
entire application on
On Feb 11, 2008, at 10:30 PM, wha wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the following version apache-
activemq-5.1-20080208.142256-20.zip
I have like 500 messages pending in the broker and I have the
following
consumer:
public void run()
{
//Create a connection
James,
I'm seeing the same situation in Spring-configured broker.
After we switched from 4.0 to 5.0.0, i'm seeing unit tests (withe embedded
activemq) give this error:
14:22:47,381 [AcitveMQ Connection Worker: vm://it-oms#4] INFO
AdvisoryConsumer - Failed to send remove command:
I can't see your entire code.
I don't know if you have a setMessageListener(YourConsumerClass) for your
consumer.
Your consumer class must implement MessageListener.
Jeroen van Bergen wrote:
The producer is happily producing messages. I can browse them using the
web
front end
Thanks, Joe.
I'm not sure content-based routing would do what I'm looking for (maybe you
can explain further).
I'd like the same group of consumers to process messages with different
priorities but to give preference in the order of processing to higher
priority messages.
On Feb 12, 2008 11:01
ActiveMQ CPP no longer uses maven as a build tool. We provide a VS2005
project file to build on windows. As far as I know the code won't build
using the VC2003 compiler as MS deems it unnecessary to implement the
full C++ ISO standard, and so there are language features that we use
that are not
I'm trying to follow this process, but I can't find this win32-msvc folder
anywhere. Is it a part of the activemqcpp source distribution? Was it at
one point, but now removed? What is this folder?
Joe
- Lalit Nagpal - wrote:
Hi All-
Here are my findings for people new to C++ and
I would say the answer to your first question is 'yes'.
Sounds like you're implementing a content-based routing pattern.
If you can't use Camel to implement the pattern, then consider configuring
the broker with composite destinations in combination with a selector to let
the broker do the
The producer is happily producing messages. I can browse them using the
web
front end supplied with ActiveMQ. When I add a QueueBrowser to the
consuming
class it can see the messages in the queue. The consumer is not picking
up
any message at all.
Have you hit this FAQ entry?
Thanks for the link, Joe.
So it looks like consumer priority is used by the broker to determine which
subscriber to choose as the exclusive consumer?
Does AMQ support message priorities? This ticket would suggest the answer
is no (http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-122)
Does anyone
Hi,
I am thinking of using embedded brokers in multiple instances of a producer
application. These applications primary goal is performance. These embedded
brokers will store and forward to another stand alone broker (or cluster of
brokers using master slave) across the network where some high
I have been trying to download the windows binary zip file from several of
the mirrors and the backup site. When the download finishes, the zip will
not open.
Is anyone else having this issue?
--
View this message in context:
Oops, sorry. When I saw this statement, I thought you wanted a message routed
to a particular queue based on its priority.
Put the messages with different priorities into different queues
If that is the case, then I think you can have the broker - using composite
destinations and selectors -
That's exactly what I've tried but I cannot get message from queue. I can
only send it. For my unit test I need to send message to custom object that
generates specific format and then sends it to the queue. Once done I need
unit test to go and get the message from queue and compare the format of
You may want to try using the 'failover' transport. With the example below,
if the broker fails the transport will begin retrying the connection to the
broker. You may want to use a different maxReconnectDelay.
failover://(tcp://localhost:61616)?maxReconnectDelay=1000
Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com
Hi Roger,
I'd disregard the consumer priority feature; it does not function as
described in the consumer priority page.
Here's the exclusive consumer web page.
http://activemq.apache.org/exclusive-consumer.html
Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com
Roger Hoover wrote:
I want to implement a
That would get the messages into their respective queues. I still need a
solution for the STOMP consumers to subscribe to multiple queues and process
messages from them in priority order. I think the select() based approach
I mentioned previously will work. I wanted to see if there were other
wha wrote:
I can't see your entire code.
I don't know if you have a setMessageListener(YourConsumerClass) for your
consumer.
Your consumer class must implement MessageListener.
What I gathered from the JMS API documentation is that a call to receive()
of a Consumer (as defined in the
18 matches
Mail list logo