Simple authentication not working: Unrecognized xbean element mapping: authenticationUser

Hey folks, i am using AMQ 4.1.2 and even the most simple authentication won't work. (same error with AMQ 5.* by the way) I am following exactly the documentation here: http://activemq.apache.org/security.html Documentation seems to be incomplete or for JAAS experts only. But one after the oth

Multiple consumers serving multiple queues

Hi, I have read a lot of documentation over the past few days trying to answer what I thought was a very standard question: I have a farm of consumers (50-100) that needs to process messages from multiple sources (10-20). Messages from some of these sources will be coming in bursts, and I need t

limit broker connections

Hi, I have a situation where several consumers are trying to connect to this one broker which throws exceptions when a lot of consumers connect at the same time. Is there any way to limit the maxConnections on a broker? Thanks, Anshul -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/lim

durable topic consumer and stomp support

Hi: How do I configure a consumer to be a durable topic consumer? http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-durable-queues-and-topics-work.html this page provides general description. However, where can I find some samples? I also have a few questions: 1. Will jms store keeps persists messages for

Re: Securing the web console impossible?

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:22 PM, j0llyr0g3r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey folks, > > i am desperately trying to find out how to configure a simple access control > for the web console, but this is simply not documented.. > > The documentation here: http://activemq.apache.org/web-consol

Securing the web console impossible?

Hey folks, i am desperately trying to find out how to configure a simple access control for the web console, but this is simply not documented.. The documentation here: http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html refers to a separate jetty instance, not to the integrated jetty. That's when

Re: ActiveMq 5.0.0 and Windows 2003 Server

Don't know if it is suppoted, but I have run it on that platform without problems. On 4/18/08, jaya_srini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > Is ActiveMq 5.0.0 release supported on a Windows 2003 server? > > thanks > jaya > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMq

Re: Reducing the size of messages

That isn't completely unexpected. To verify, create a text file with "hello world" and the ZIP it. The zip file will most likely be bigger than the original uncompressed text file. Compression is a trade off and should be carefully measured. On 4/18/08, tanshul22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: JAXB Version Conflict

Never mind. Maven exclude did the trick: org.apache.activemq activemq-core 5.0.0 javax.xml jaxb-api com.sun.xml.bind jaxb-impl

Re: JAXB Version Conflict

Hi Tom, I think JAXB 2.1 is backwards compatible with 2.0, so I would try a dependencyManagement section of your webapp pom and in there, set the jaxb-api version to 2.1. This *should* force that version even for transient dependencies, but if it doesn't work you may have to do an exclusion of the

ActiveMq 5.0.0 and Windows 2003 Server

Hello Is ActiveMq 5.0.0 release supported on a Windows 2003 server? thanks jaya -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMq-5.0.0-and-Windows-2003-Server-tp16764015s2354p16764015.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reducing the size of messages

This is weird. I setUseCompression on both producer and consumer side and this inflates my message size. When the compression is false on the producer side, my message size is smaller, irrespective of compression being true or false on consumer. I am sending a textMessage "Hello World". Wonder wh

JAXB Version Conflict

Hello We are attempting to use the new CXF REST support to expose a webapp. When I say new I mean we're using the CXF 2.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT. The web app also needs to fire JMS messages. For that we are, of course, using ActiveMq (5.0.0). The problem we are having is that it appears the new CXF

Creating queue and accessing them through different session

Hi, I'm new to ActiveMQ. Here is my usecase: I want to create a queue using a non-transacted session. Put in a message in that queue. And then access the message from that queue from a different transacted session. To put in the message I do: nonTxSession = (QueueSession) queueConnection.cr

flow control and durable queues

Is it possible to use producer flow control with durable queues? Online documentation seems to say that flow control only controls the size of the in-memory queue. What I am trying to achieve is some sort of queue multiplexing. I have a bunch of input queues that are served by a farm of consumer

Re: What is best practice for creating Producers?

BTW there's a FAQ entry about this... http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-use-jms-efficiently.html On 18/04/2008, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 18 Apr 2008, at 06:26, Aidan wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I am using ActiveMQ 5 and am having an issue with my server (running > > embed

Re: What is best practice for creating Producers?

Thanks Rob for your reply. We were discussing the problem today over coffee, and I suppose I had always used it in a fashion similar to a JDBC connection. I have changed my code to use a single producer for all sending, however on the server over time I still notice that the memory statistics see