Hi Sateesh,
could you provide a JUnit test case ?
thanks,
Rob
On 15 Aug 2008, at 05:18, sparky2708 wrote:
Rob,
what is the solution to use in the C# client. I don't believe it
has a
PooledConnectionFactory and can you please shed some light on why
the way
that it used to work in 4.1 d
Rob,
what is the solution to use in the C# client. I don't believe it has a
PooledConnectionFactory and can you please shed some light on why the way
that it used to work in 4.1 doesn't work in 5.1? Why should we need to
replace the way we establish a connection?
rajdavies wrote:
>
> please
Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Joe Fernandez
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> If for example you start() a connection with 'failover' and you set
>> maxReconnectAttempts to 2, start() throws an exception after 2 reconnect
>> attempts. That's fine. However, if you th
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Joe Fernandez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If for example you start() a connection with 'failover' and you set
> maxReconnectAttempts to 2, start() throws an exception after 2 reconnect
> attempts. That's fine. However, if you then go back and issue the start()
>
Is this supposed to be working with NMS as well?
Joe Fernandez wrote:
>
> Peruse the ActiveMQ source code tree under
>
> .../activemq-core/src/test
>
> There are lots of test cases there and there are a couple of
> embedded-related test cases in
>
> .../activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apac
If for example you start() a connection with 'failover' and you set
maxReconnectAttempts to 2, start() throws an exception after 2 reconnect
attempts. That's fine. However, if you then go back and issue the start()
again on the same connection, the 2 reconnect attempts will no longer be
attempted.
Not sure I understand? So on failure you want to auto reconnect but
you don't want to block until the reconnection happens? Not this is
possible when connecting to a remote broker.
Perhaps your best bet is to use an embedded broker so that way you
never have broker failure. All your operations
Ah.. so this from .NET right? Does anybody recall if the NMS client
implements/uses the openwire connection KeepAlive stuff?
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:29 PM, BrianQADC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm using the standard poller script with activemessaging, and have noticed
> occaisional consumer
A connection will hold on to messages that's trying to deliver to it's
client until the broker detects that the connection has failed.
In the last case is you main thread blocked somewhere?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 8:07 AM, SebastianR.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> First of all my set
Hi in the case of the Journal implementation, that map of in flight
transactions gets repopulated with the transactions when the journal
first gets started. The journal re-plays all the journal records and
this re-builds the map of non-committed transactions. See the
recover() method.
BTW.. on a
Hi Ryan,
You could open an issue, but to fix this we really need a new/extended
JDBC store implementation. The current implementation was not really
designed to support recovering XA transactions. It was always
intended that the Journal would be in charge of doing that bit of
work. The new impl
Yes, thank you.. I have been solved this problem..
Use this way:
ObjectName conName = new
ObjectName("org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=localhost,Type=Connection,*");
Set connections = connection.queryNames(conName, null);
can get all the connections to the Broker, and then use ConnectionViewMBe
Hi.
I've noticed that the Listener which are stored in the session (from
MessageListenerServlet) is not serializable:
>From my app servers logs.
[15:46:42.393] Failed storing persistent session attribute `mls.listener'.
Persistent session values must extend java.io.Serializable.
[15:46:42.393] j
It's working!
As usual my mistake - sender web-app has poper configuration of jms
connection factory with user and password, but client webapp hasn't.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-authenticate-transport-without-SSL-certificate-tp18979774p18981250.html
Sent
In addition to everything mentioned I was able to use
jaasAuthenticationPlugind it is configured in activemq.xml:
...
...
transportConnector is changed to tcp and the rest configuration is left the
same
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-authenticate
Maybe you can use JMX?
hardtolose wrote:
>
> Hi, everybody..
>
> I need the connection to get the client's "connectionID" and "remote
> Address"..
>
> Can anybody tell me how to solve this problem?
>
> Not use local Embedded Broker, but use remote Broker..Many thanks in
> advance!
>
--
V
Hello,
First of all my setup:
NMS: Yesterdays HEAD SVN revision
Broker: external broker running on ActiveMQ 4.1.1
.Net Framework: 2.0
IDE: MS Visual Studio 2008 with C# as programming language
I recognize very strange behaviour when it comes to a connection failure. To
show this I wrote a littl
Hi!
I'm trying to get ActiveMQ 4.1.2 working with
jaasCertificateAuthenticationPlugin. As a result
JaasCertificateAuthenticationBroker class at line 75 throws
SecurityException. I'm a bit confused because I was unable to find any info
regarding this exception. As well plain SSL connection is est
18 matches
Mail list logo
