AMQ Patching and Updating

2009-01-27 Thread shaf
Hello, I have a solution deployed using AMQ5.1, and since it has come to my attention that triversal issue on AMQ when adding a [;] simicolon on the ActiveMQ link - http://ip address:8161/admin/xml/;queues.jsp, it exposes the filesystem. Knowing that we use Jetty as an embedded server, how do

JmsAppender - multiple java.naming.provider.url

2009-01-27 Thread selezovikj
I am logging messages using log4j to a queue on an ActiveMQBroker. Now, I want dependent on whether a flag is on to be able to log to a broker specified by let's say: java.naming.provider.url = tcp://machineA:61616, and if it is off to log to java.naming.provider.url = tcp://machineB:61616 When

Re: [activemq-users] Mailing list subject

2009-01-27 Thread David Newcomb
Fair enough. All my list mail goes into one folder, which means I can't visually separate emails from different lists. I can, but only by thinking that subjects without markers belong to ActiveMQ. Hope I don't end up on any other lists that don't add markers - then I'm into having to have

NMS and non-responsive queue

2009-01-27 Thread Gabe Westmaas
Hey all, One of the developers in our company is writing an application that uses NMS and every once in a while the queue becomes unresponsive to consumers, although producers can continue to produce to it. Other times a message will get stuck at the top of the queue and producers and

Re: ActiveMQ on NetApp / NFS - How's it working out?

2009-01-27 Thread JasonCzerak
JasonCzerak wrote: JasonCzerak wrote: How's this working out for folks? Any gotchya's? How about tips on performances, mount options, vol options, tcp/ip tuning for small files, etc etc etc. I read of locking issues on the 4.x versions, this has all been solved on 5.x correct?

Re: 5.2, Problems Deleting a Queue

2009-01-27 Thread MaenXe
Can I bump my own thread? It seems there are other users who have this issue, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest in fixing it. Is this a bug? M@ MaenXe wrote: I have a couple of Queues that I am unable to completely get rid of. If I delete the Queue either from JMX(using

Re: 5.2, Problems Deleting a Queue

2009-01-27 Thread Rob Davies
I believe this is fixed in 5.3 - (trunk) - which will be released in the next few weeks or so On 27 Jan 2009, at 20:14, MaenXe wrote: Can I bump my own thread? It seems there are other users who have this issue, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest in fixing it. Is this a

Re: ActiveMQ on NetApp / NFS - How's it working out?

2009-01-27 Thread Bill Schuller
I will be doing the same and will share my results. On 1/27/09 2:10 PM, JasonCzerak czer...@jostens.com wrote: Well, i'll be finding out in a few weeks here. ;-)

Re: Securing active MQ

2009-01-27 Thread ar13
OK I have been unable to get ActiveMQ to work in a system with two connected networks in the this set up system A has two NICs NIC 0 connected to the public network NIC 1 connected to a private network I have configured AMQ to only listen on the private network for messages. I have posted

Re: 5.2, Problems Deleting a Queue

2009-01-27 Thread David Jencks
I ran into some related problems (on trunk/5.3) where deleting a queue basically completely hosed the broker but I've been completely unable to reproduce this outside the javaee5 tck environment. However all the tests I've tried in public environments have worked great so most likely it