AMQ Persistence vs Kaha: Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

2009-02-21 Thread hackingbear
OK, I nailed down the problem (and update the bug.) The default AMQ Persistence store shipped with 5.2 is very slow. Clean out the data directory wouldn't help. Switching over to Kaha works. now, before the problem is fixed. I want to know what are the plus and minus of using kaha store, comparin

Re: Memoryleak when consuming messages from KahaDBStore

2009-02-21 Thread Cybexion
Hi Gary, we just made a new test which startet yesterday. JVM settings of AMQ where 3 GB heap size. We send about 800 msg / sec into the queue, the size was limited to 3 GB. During that time sending messages to the queue got slower and slower. Even after the queue was full and new messages have

STOMP redelivery policy

2009-02-21 Thread Roger Hoover
Is there any way to configure maximumRedeliveries for a STOMP connection? I ran tests against 5.2 and 4.1.1 and both redeliver the message infinitely. This causes consumers to keep choking over and over again on the same message unless the consumers implement their own maxRetries logic. It looks

Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

2009-02-21 Thread hackingbear
Test case written, bug filed. https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22141040.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Prefetch=0 how to?

2009-02-21 Thread hackingbear
The latest codes in the SVN still seems to receive from two receivers. Maybe I miss something? Anyway, I have written a test case which depends on nothing but AMQ. I was using 5.1 and this bug shows up in 5.1; I tried running it in 5.2 for several times, and it always works. [What prevents me fro