Sorry, but I don't have jira account. Is it possible to create a jira
anonymously?
Gary Tully wrote:
thanks for the input. Can you raise an jira for this bug so it is not
lost?
On 15 February 2010 13:35, akos akos.ba...@p92.hu wrote:
Hi,
I've found a small bug in amq. The
Hi,
you can create your account here
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Signup!default.jspa
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Tue,
jira #: AMQ-2608
Gary Tully wrote:
thanks for the input. Can you raise an jira for this bug so it is not
lost?
On 15 February 2010 13:35, akos akos.ba...@p92.hu wrote:
Hi,
I've found a small bug in amq. The
org.apache.activemq.util.IntrospectionSupport.findSetterMethod uses
Hi,
I've encountered similar problem with http transport. When I try to get a
message with 100KB+ payload (tried TextMessage and MapMessage), I get:
2010-02-16 09:37:28,147 | WARN | / | org.mortbay.log | btpool0-1 - /
java.io.UTFDataFormatException: encoded string too long: 219486 bytes
Hi,
thanks for raising the issue. Is there a chance you can provide a
reproducible test case?
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Tue, Feb
Hi,
in order to reproduce this, it should be enough to follow these steps (I'm
assuming 5.2.0 windows binaries):
1) Add transportConnector name=http uri=http://172.18.131.66:61223; /
to your activemq.xml config file in transportConnectors (change the uri to
match your ip address)
2) run consumer
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 05:13 -0800, muadd wrote:
Hi,
in order to reproduce this, it should be enough to follow these steps (I'm
assuming 5.2.0 windows binaries):
1) Add transportConnector name=http uri=http://172.18.131.66:61223; /
to your activemq.xml config file in transportConnectors
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 21:27 -0800, krishna81m wrote:
How come many of the openwire-c error messages like this were unanswered and
the last commit was in 2006. Are there any test cases for this API?
There's currently not an active maintainer of the C client, we could use
some help in that
Thanks for pointing to this fix Tim.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Gary,
prefetch=1 alone would not work for my case;
We build CXF web services with JMS transport on top of ActiveMQ.
And syncronous cyclic (client)-A-B-A calls sometimes lead to deadlock:
B-A message gets into prefetch buffer of the very same consumer that
currently handles (client)-A
I've searched both forums and have found nothing specific to the problem I'm
having. I'm using activemq 5.3.0 with 2 servers running. I've enabled all
of the jmx components in the activemq.xml file
managementContext
managementContext
There has been some work in that area after 5.3.0 release. Can you try
latest snapshot and see if the problem is still there?
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog -
The snapshot of 5.3.0 or 5.3.1?
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
There has been some work in that area after 5.3.0 release. Can you try
latest snapshot and see if the problem is still there?
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
Hi,
Both 5.3.1 and 5.4 snapshots should contain same changes
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action -
I've tried the 5.4 snapshot and it works,
thanks a lot
Timothy Bish wrote:
This issue should be fixed in the 5.4 SNAPSHOT builds, I'd recommend you
give that a try. The same issue was reported previously, see:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1308
Regards
--
Did you try this on 5.4-SNAPSHOT ?- I think there's a fix in trunk
On 16 Feb 2010, at 13:13, muadd wrote:
Hi,
in order to reproduce this, it should be enough to follow these
steps (I'm
assuming 5.2.0 windows binaries):
1) Add transportConnector name=http uri=http://
172.18.131.66:61223 /
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:54 PM, James Strachan
james.strac...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 February 2010 15:38, Jean-Yves LEBLEU jleb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to use the failover transport
(failover:(tcp://localhost:61618)), and I have some questions :
I did a test with a simple
Which version are you using BTW?
On 16 February 2010 16:17, Jean-Yves LEBLEU jleb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:54 PM, James Strachan
james.strac...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 February 2010 15:38, Jean-Yves LEBLEU jleb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to use the failover
Hi all ActiveMQ gurus,
BACKGROUND:
I'm using AMQ 5.3 with the local vm:// transport and wish to make use of the
copyMessageOnSend = FALSE convention to send my messages by reference
[instead of by value]. Given the dynamic nature of our ObjectMessage-based
messages and varying size of the
Hi Maarten
Kinda.
MapMessages are significantly more expensive but no real surprise there.
I upgraded the machine and did significant optimising on the GC, paying
particular attention to parallel / conc mark sweep
eg
-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode -XX:+CMSIncrementalPacing
have you set:
factory.setObjectMessageSerializationDefered(true);
http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-use-the-vm-transport.html
On 16 February 2010 16:49, bob.deremer
bob.dere...@burningskysoftware.comwrote:
Hi all ActiveMQ gurus,
BACKGROUND:
I'm using AMQ 5.3 with the local vm://
No slow consumer is defined.
-AGT
Gary Tully wrote:
does the advice on slow consumer
handinghttp://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumer-handling.html
help?
On 12 February 2010 14:02, AGT ajitgu...@hotmail.com wrote:
We are using Topic to send and consume messages.
All Messages
you are running separate sessions for each of those dequeue/enqueue stats?
in my flow control tests even when one particular session was hung other
sessions to the same broker was fine, just when I overwhelmed broker and GC
/ disk checkpointing occurred that it got really bad.
have you turned
Sorry for not posting this update sooner...
I managed to figure out what is going on by downloading the 5.3.0 source
code and digging into the ActiveMQConnection and Session classes. I can see
that the object being set as the payload of an ObjectMessage must have the
Serializable tag interface.
Hi,
maybe the following init-script might be an option.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2453
This script is also capable to run multiple instances of activemq.
-- Usage:
$ ./activemq
INFO: loading '/home/mschoechlin/.activemqrc'
INFO: useing java
Not really. We're running 2 servers for failover reasons, and would really
like to run them in a cluster with failover. Multiple instances on 1 server
won't provide failover.
activemq-admin stop --all
does not stop the jvm if the server is waiting for the exclusive lock. it
does stop the
Hi,
We are starting a new project and wanted some input/feedback to validate if
ActiveMQ is a good fit.
We have a single central server and thousands of remote clients. Clients
maybe located behind a NAT or Firewall. Every now and then we would like to
send a message from central server to a
Hi Gary,
I checked out your test case and seeing that that worked fine set out
to figure out why my test case didn't.
As it turns out it is because of my tempUsage:
systemUsage
systemUsage
memoryUsage
memoryUsage limit=100 mb/
28 matches
Mail list logo