Hi Alex,
thanks for this thorough testing of new refactored Ajax API. I'm very
glad it works better then the old one. ActiveMQ 5.4.0 should be
released soon and all releases from that point on will include this
new implementation. There will be no more 5.3.x releases, so the old
implementation
Oh, now I see.
I thought 'synchronous' means that a producer send only one message in order
not to disorder a request.
I also didn't think synchronous producer in MOM can send multiple requests
simultaneously because of misunderstanding the sequence of messages should
be ordered strictly.
Hi all,
I have a client that do a durable subscriptio to a topic.
It register with a static client id.
After a connectivity loss (an so a new re-connection), this exception is
thrown and connection cannot be
re-established:
2010-07-15 13:49:04,700 ERROR - javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException:
If you use the failover: protocol, the reconnect will be transparent
and the broker will be aware of the possibility of a duplicate and
suppress that exception.
Otherwise you will need to backoff the reconnect till the broker has a
chance to recognise and deal with the disconnect
On 15 July 2010
Thank you very much. I'll try failover mecanism.
After some tests I see that the code that I have written works correctly
with tcp://
but the above problem only occurs in http:// or in https:// mode.
It could be a bug?
Gary Tully wrote:
If you use the failover: protocol, the reconnect will
And also.
If I kill all the clients an I leave active only the broker,
If I try to reconnect using http (or tcp) I get the same error.
So client is not de-registered.
This appens also if I use failover protocol. After client kill/restart. Same
exception is raised
Hi,
I am using ActiveMQ 5.3.2 on Sun JDK 1.6.20 on Linux.
localhost/tmp_storage directory structure is created in the directory
specified by dataDirectory parameter to broker tag, even if KahaDB is
used as a persistence adapter. This directory structure seems to be
part of AMQ Message Store
Hi Vjaceslavs,
this parameter instructs the broker that when it shuts down it try to
stop surrounding application context. This is helpful when embedding
broker in various environments like OSGi container or Spring app, so
it's not much of a concern if you're running it standalone.
BTW. I've put
This is something that has been resolved for 5.4, the temp store is
now using kahaDB, in 5.3.x the temp store used the AMQ store
irrespective of the persistence adapter.
On 15 July 2010 15:12, Vjaceslavs Klimovs vklim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using ActiveMQ 5.3.2 on Sun JDK 1.6.20 on Linux.
I wrote the following directions into activemq.xml
When I omit the inner virtualDestinationInterceptor then the
incming msgs are mirrored successfully as intended to the Topic
myqueue22.qmirror
But when I want to forward them from this Topic into a second queue
myqueue22_log everything fails.
I'm using an embedded Broker in a Spring application context. When the
context is destroyed, the broker is stopped (I can confirm this by the
broker's logging output), however, unless I kill the jvm instance, the
broker never releases it's lock on the persistence directory or unbinds from
the tcp
Hi,
Have you tried upgrading your gcc in the centos and debian machines? This
would keep a consisting environment so that we can rule out that possible
root of problems?
Regards
On 16 July 2010 11:49, Romain CHANU romainch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am currently upgrading my client from
12 matches
Mail list logo