You'd end up with journaled entries not in the store.
On Oct 27, 2010, at 8:00 PM, kseelam wrote:
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> Is it possible if we use different (its own) Journal on each Server
> (master/slave servers) and use the common DB?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> View this message in context:
Thanks for reply.
Is it possible if we use different (its own) Journal on each Server
(master/slave servers) and use the common DB?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JDBC-Master-Slave-approach-with-Journal-for-HA-tp3014521p3016538.html
Sent from
The journal is not shared, so - no it is not a good idea for master/slave
http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html
On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:44 PM, kseelam wrote:
>
> Also as per the 5.4.0 schema, there is a useDatabaseLock attribute in
> journalPersistenceAdapterFactory
>
> http://activemq.apa
Also as per the 5.4.0 schema, there is a useDatabaseLock attribute in
journalPersistenceAdapterFactory
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core-5.4.0-schema.html#journalPersistenceAdapterFactory
Element: journalPersistenceAdapterFactory
useDatabaseLock xs:boolean Sets whether o
Thanks lot for your reply Rob.
So the Journal can't be used in Cluster environment for HA. Is it correct?
Also as per the Journal config defined in
http://activemq.apache.org/persistence.html ;
Can't we use this configuration on each server (by h
what it needs is a test case, there was one attached to
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2596, maybe that can
help validate.
thanks for the heads up.
On 27 October 2010 14:14, chris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that in 5.3.2 the removal of a consumer in a network of
> brokers sometimes
Hi,
I noticed that in 5.3.2 the removal of a consumer in a network of
brokers sometimes triggers the removal of the network bridged
subscription even though there are still some other running consumers.
The problem was resolved in 5.4 with revision 949742 to handle
AMQ-2754. But looking at the cod
PJR69 wrote:
>
> So, I'm working on a distributed near-realtime simulator system where I
> have several simulator components managing and producing simulated
> entities to a distributed virtual simulated world and several applications
> that are used to manage and monitor the entities in the sim
Thanks for the reply. TibcoEMS does feel a bit "heavy" for our need wrt
licensing and "freedom of deployment". With that I mean that there will
probably be lots of different deployments that are built and then torn down
often so it won't be very stable environment. Here I like the broker-peering
a
I am a fan of AMQ. However, I am not sure that the performance of AMQ is
good enough yet for some production systems. So I tend to use AMQ during
development and a proprietary offering for production. This also helps
deal with the fear that some mgmt have over using open source software
(deep s
I'd like to ask your opinion whether ActiveMQ is a good fit for my needs.
(I'm quite newbie when it comes to JMS/ActiveMQ, just have been reading
about them for the past few days...).
So, I'm working on a distributed near-realtime simulator system where I have
several simulator components managin
You shouldn't use the high performance journal with JDBC Master/Slave -
http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-master-slave.html
with the journal and JDBC database - messages are stored in the journal - and
only the references to those messages are stored in the journal - which would
be local to the ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
