Hi,
Indeed PooledConnectionFactory is the way to go if you want to have the best
performances with ActiveMQ.
Can you tell us a little bit more on how you do send your messages to be so
badly impacted by the lock on the pool? I suppose your are using the
JmsTemplate from Spring to send your mes
Hi Tim,
Yes, you are correct. Once I started using setClientId, it has given me
exception.
Thanks Tim.
Thanks & Regards
Suneel
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Bish [mailto:tabish...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 April 2011 20:22
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: No Errors at ActiveMQ-
Also can you check if the same happens with the latest 5.5.0 release?
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-
The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale
There is org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection#setExceptionListener
You may be better dealing with the root cause of the exception. Either
properly close a connection or use the failover transport such that
that exception is avoided b/c a new connection with the same id is
treated as a reconnect
Can you open a jira issue to track this and attach your logs and
specify the version. That looks like a bug.
On 18 April 2011 16:21, Simon-Pierre LeBel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having some issues with ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher threads.
> Whenever I get an InactivityIOException the thread goes i
cool... will add it in to our project...
last version we use has been quite stable (3.2.4 windows):
uptime: 104d 21h 59m
cms messages sent/recv: 208.639.712
:-)
Søren
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-ActiveMQ-CPP-Version-3-3-0-Released-tp3453898p3
Was that a migration from 5.3.x to 5.4.x?
It looks like it is failing on the first use of the DLQ which is odd,
as if I cannot read the index for that destination. Rebuilding the
index would probably help, but I would be great to figure if it is
reproducible.
On 17 April 2011 13:18, Martin C. wro
Condotta writes:
[...]
> it's somehow managing to get the correct one. I haven't tried this
> with multiple clients so I can't say whether it actually would work
> properly. But what is the expected bnehaviour and how is it
> managed. Is it possible to write request reply with STOMP and use tem