Re: PooledConnections Poor Performance

Hi, Indeed PooledConnectionFactory is the way to go if you want to have the best performances with ActiveMQ. Can you tell us a little bit more on how you do send your messages to be so badly impacted by the lock on the pool? I suppose your are using the JmsTemplate from Spring to send your mes

RE: No Errors at ActiveMQ-CPP client for wrong credentials.

Hi Tim, Yes, you are correct. Once I started using setClientId, it has given me exception. Thanks Tim. Thanks & Regards Suneel -Original Message- From: Timothy Bish [mailto:tabish...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 April 2011 20:22 To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: No Errors at ActiveMQ-

Re: ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher thread

Also can you check if the same happens with the latest 5.5.0 release? Regards -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb - The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale

Re: How to catch javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException from AMQ

There is org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection#setExceptionListener You may be better dealing with the root cause of the exception. Either properly close a connection or use the failover transport such that that exception is avoided b/c a new connection with the same id is treated as a reconnect

Re: ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher thread

Can you open a jira issue to track this and attach your logs and specify the version. That looks like a bug. On 18 April 2011 16:21, Simon-Pierre LeBel wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having some issues with ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher threads. > Whenever I get an InactivityIOException the thread goes i

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ-CPP Version 3.3.0 Released

cool... will add it in to our project... last version we use has been quite stable (3.2.4 windows): uptime: 104d 21h 59m cms messages sent/recv: 208.639.712 :-) Søren -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-ActiveMQ-CPP-Version-3-3-0-Released-tp3453898p3

Re: "Caught an exception sending to DLQ"

Was that a migration from 5.3.x to 5.4.x? It looks like it is failing on the first use of the DLQ which is odd, as if I cannot read the index for that destination. Rebuilding the index would probably help, but I would be great to figure if it is reproducible. On 17 April 2011 13:18, Martin C. wro

Re: Stomp Temp Queues

Condotta writes: [...] > it's somehow managing to get the correct one. I haven't tried this > with multiple clients so I can't say whether it actually would work > properly. But what is the expected bnehaviour and how is it > managed. Is it possible to write request reply with STOMP and use tem