Just created a JIRA for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3469.
This might actually be a bug.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-loss-in-network-of-brokers-transactional-send-tp3588714p3764707.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing
vote for: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1853
On 24 August 2011 02:48, neoman harira...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I also need to solve the same problem avanish explained. Message ordering
is not important
--
View this message in context:
Hi all,
I'm developing a multi-user chat and need to authenticate clients in an
existing database, anyone have an example about how do this?
Another question is how list topics and how list user registered in topics
on client.
Thanks a lot
Volnei Munhoz
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I am trying to get a very simple embedded broker running, inside a jar,
running correctly. I have the
broker reading the activemq.xml file from the jar. But what about other
needed files? It appears to
be trying to download other xsds.
My assumption was: If I have the right jars, it
I actually don't have a good answer for your question but I thought I would
add something based on my recent experience...
activemq-all seems to already have an slf4j (5.x) contained as a dependency.
This caused me issues because I was trying to use SLF4j 6.x. I switched to
activemq-core and
Hello, we are using the latest CMS library to talk to ActiveMQ
5.5.0-fuse-00-43. Some times the CMS clients hang on a message send. The
stack trace is attached from a process stuck on a Solaris 8 box. Do you
have any ideas as to why this is happening?
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 07:55 -0700, urciolo wrote:
Hello, we are using the latest CMS library to talk to ActiveMQ
5.5.0-fuse-00-43. Some times the CMS clients hang on a message send. The
stack trace is attached from a process stuck on a Solaris 8 box. Do you
have any ideas as to why this is
We do have producer flow control enabled. However, we were not at that limit.
Attached is another stack trace from a linux client. This is on a different
box, but attached to the same broker as the first stack trace I sent (cleaner
stack trace). The snip below shows onException. Did
Is ActiveMq Streams recomendable to implement a voice chat? Or definitively
ActiveMq is not good for it? I'm interested in develop a opensource voice
chat using ActiveMq as base.
Thanks
Volnei Granado Munhoz
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 08:51 -0700, urciolo wrote:
We do have producer flow control enabled. However, we were not at that
limit. Attached is another stack trace from a linux client. This is on a
different box, but attached to the same broker as the first stack trace I
sent (cleaner stack
we've externalized a lot of parameter values into properties file and
use Spring's PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer in our xml
this is what i am trying to do, unfortunately using xbean broker tags,
the spring placeholder are ignored. i want to run multiple embedded
brokers with tomcat using
Possibly similar to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3473
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-loss-in-network-of-brokers-transactional-send-tp3588714p3766852.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Here's the top of my activemq.xml:
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:amq=http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
I'm seeing some strange behavior with ActiveMQ 5.4.2 pure master slave
setup...
5.4.2 master running on mqmaster01:
broker xmlns=http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core;
brokerName=localhost dataDirectory=${activemq.base}/data
destroyApplicationContextOnStop=true schedulerSupport=false
I have a similar similar setup (flow control turned off)
producer == EmbeddedConsumer == consumer. Producers producing messages to
kaha persisted topics
In the test setup we have
10 producers per virtual-topic with 10 topics. There are 10 consumers for
each virtual topic
i.e., total of 100
15 matches
Mail list logo