Sorry, I must have glazed over the request-reply requirement. You can
still do it with a Camel route, you don't want to use Camel's default
request-reply behavior, which assumes one hop.
- Portal Producing Broker (set ReplyTo) -> Camel route Content Based
Router (ignore ReplyTo) -> Destinatio
Hi, i'm currently using ActiveMQ 5.4.2 & running into an issue with a store
and forward configuration for a distributed STOMP queue. Trying to figure
out if this is a bug in my configuration, expected behavior in activemq or
something else...
So I have 2 brokers - a local broker (stagingapp1), and
Thanks for the quick response. The content-based router seems to be good
for messages going only one way. However, in this scenario, when the
messages go out, the enumeration services need to reply to them at a
designated temp queue (at least that is my understanding of the
request/reply model in A
Chris-
Separate queues is a good approach. Additionally, it doesn't sound like
you need to do a network of brokers here. Stand-alone brokers and a
simple Camel route running inside the producer broker could handle the
content-based router requirement where you want messages sent to a
partic
Hello,
Here is more information.
It looks like beans defined in XBeans are not created the same as beans
defined in Blueprint.
Here is the BeanRecipe for a XBean-defined bean :
name : .component-3
properties {id=myID}
Here is the BeanRecipe for a Blueprint-defined bean :
name : myID
properties
Oscar-
What is your Java heap size?
On 1/27/12 5:29 AM, Oscar Pernas wrote:
Hi, sorry for the spam:
I have the following configuration
There is a little write up on the detlail of kahadb gc at:
http://activemq.apache.org/why-do-kahadb-log-files-remain-after-cleanup.html
On 26 January 2012 23:38, ceposta wrote:
> Abimael,
>
> Just to follow up on what Matt said, the messages in the log files will only
> be deleted once they're *a
thanks for sharing your solution
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/storeUsage-not-working-tp4314236p4333264.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
well I tried this in the past too :-(. But upgrading was the only successful
solution.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-4-1-weird-behaviour-tp4312895p4333256.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, sorry for the spam:
I have the following configuration
and memory usage like this:
Thank you!
i was try it before, but it was not working.
To whom it can be interested correction is to submit 'true' as string at
php, not as boolean value.
So headers will look like $headers = array('persistent' => 'true'); not
$headers = array('persistent' => true);
May be that will safe time to
Hi,
expiration and persistence are something different. A persistent
message can still expire, a non-expiring message can still be
non-persistent.
The difference is: if a message is persistent, it will be available
even if the broker restarts, if a message has an expiration, it will
be deleted if
I dont know why, but If I set fileCursor and to a topic my broker starts to
consume memory untill hungs with java heap size limit... fileCursor should
not avoid this?
2012/1/27 Oscar Pernas
> Hi all,
>
> Im trying to optimize and hardening activemq and I have some question:
>
> - If I set produc
Hi,
I want to use "SQL Server 2008" for Master/Slave configuration.
However it is not allowing to have database locks with exception as below :
ERROR | Failed to acquire lock: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException:
A processing error "Line 1: FOR UPDATE clause allowed only for DECLARE C
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4332902/test_s.php test_s.php
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4332902/activemq.xml
activemq.xml
Here is my script at php and activemq.xml config file.
to run at php to send message i do "php test_s.php send", to read what can
be read "php t
15 matches
Mail list logo