Hi,
This should generally work alright.
You may want to configure for debug logging on org.apache.activemq.network
and inspect the logging output carefully when the bridge should get restored.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:57 AM, Kai
I have a network of 3 brokers running but sometimes the brokers fail in a
rather unique and annoying way.
They still accept connections but otherwise stop to communicate with the
client (even those still connected).
For new connections created in java this means:
code
con =
Hi Matt,
Thx for inputs.
I tried failover transport but having one issue. Produces app is sending
messages to active broker (say broker1), if I take the broker1 down, broker 2
gets the lock on DB and producer automatically starts sending messages to
broker2, which is good. However when I take
We are trying to build a system that would be heavily message system based.
Trying to publish a topic and that needs to be brokered by a single process
to distribute that topic to the appropriate queue. But instead of creating
that broker code we needed to find out if an ActiveMQ Queue can
How can I receive a message from a MQ server, this is, a configuration where
remote machine defines a channel (IP+port) on which it sends its msgs ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/receive-a-msg-from-a-Websphere-MQ-server-mq-channel-tp4351614p4351614.html
Hi Khan-
Yes, you can achieve the desired behavior in two ways. One is using
ActiveMQ's Virtual Destinations, the other is to use a Camel route that
reads from the Topic and publishes to the desired queue.
I recommend using the Camel route, because it is more flexible and you
can
We have been using Spring and I probably could have easily created a Spring
process to do the same that you suggested to do in Camel. However, it seems
that some people here would like the other approach better. I am not too
familiar with ActiveMQ in general -- hence, would like to get some
I'm trying to build apache-activemq-5.5.1-fuse-01-13 and I keep getting the
following error:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project activemq-camel: Could not resolve
dependencies for project
org.apache.activemq:activemq-camel:bundle:5.5.1-fuse-01-13: The following
artifacts could not be
Add the Fuse repo to your Maven settings
http://repo.fusesource.com/nexus/content/groups/public/
Matt Pavlovich
On 2/2/12 10:33 AM, Chris Robison wrote:
I'm trying to build apache-activemq-5.5.1-fuse-01-13 and I keep getting the
following error:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project
There has been a discussion on the JBoss 7 forums about errors getting the
ActiveMQ resource adapter working correctly in JBoss (see
https://community.jboss.org/message/648857)
When JBoss attempts to deploy the rar file, it was throwing this error:
ERROR
I had the same issue and unfortunely it seems that it is back .
My test applications are not equals of you, as I am doing some tests about
failover and H.A. using 2 simple applications.
But, the bottom line is : when master goes down, you (and me) want that the
slave start working properly AND
I just forgot to mention that it works properly IF you use durable topic
subscriber .
If you use dynamic topics , created by code , I noticed that it does not
work (as I had explained in my previous comments and I assume is very
similar your scenario ) .
Regards
--
View this message in context:
Oh no! No it does not work.. I did another test to check and it does not
work even with Durable SUbscriber .
Scenario :
2 brokers : master and slave
1 producer with failover uri on the code to connect and provide messages;
1 consumer with failover uri on the code to connect and consume
Has anyone been able to use the LDAPAuthorizationMap successfully with
Active Directory? In my investigation, I don't think it will ever work in
its current state. When looking at the code, it is making the assumption
that the value of the member attribute (or what ever attribute you are
using)
Abimael-
It might be helpful to understand that the client-side fail-over is
handled by the ActiveMQ client-side library. The end-user just needs to
code the consumer program as if it was talking to one broker.
I suggest adding DEBUG, or TRACE level logging on the client-side. You
may
Chris-
This is one of the major flaws in LDAP. There are a number of
conventions for handling group membership, and no strictly followed
standard. Listing of common names, such as CN values, or listing full
DNs. Then, there is the model of dynamic groups, where the user entry
has the
Hi,
I would multicast messages to different (dynamically determined) consumers.
I'm asking myself if it is more efficient to use multiple queues or use a
topic with durable subscription and selectors (I am using persistence).
I would say topics reduce the number of persisted messages but i am
Hi
The symptoms of our configuration got more and more weird. We use currently
topics where we have up to 5 producers and about the same number of
consumers, mostly spread over the two boxes having a broker each. We did a
run overnight and it ended with one broker falling over with not enough
18 matches
Mail list logo
