On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 16:07 -0600, Chris Robison wrote:
> I implemented a tracer and and turned on debug and the client is endlessly
> spitting out the following:
>
> 2012-05-08 18:01:40.5109|DEBUG|VOAuto.Services.Citrix.RequestInvoker|DEBUG:
> AdvisoryConsumer removing:
> temp-queue://ID:POTMIP1
I'm observing the behavior that looks strange to me - for some reason,
broker keep deleting existing journal log files and creates a new ones with
incremented number even though there is no active producers running.
I'm doing acceptance testing on 5.5.1
--
View this message in context:
http://ac
I can successfully put and get a message using my client app by way of HTTP
if I change the Content-Type from text/plain to
"application/x-www-form-urlencoded" and precede my body with
"destination=request&type=queue&body=".
The default demo web app doesn't seem to like the way I tried to send
tex
Gary, do you mean pointing the master slave brokers back at the embedded
broker? I already have the embedded broker pointing at both master and slave
with static failover.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Embedded-broker-to-master-slave-topologies-not-workin
Hi Luke,
could you check the number of consumer on the queue ?
I saw a similar issue where my consumer was present while the load was
not too high, and on heavy load, the consumer disappears and so the
messages stayed in pending.
Regards
JB
On 05/08/2012 06:27 PM, Luke Noel-Storr wrote:
I
It appears that the message did not get my content. The following is a debug
excerpt from the broker log. Please let me know if it reveals a mistake on
my end. Thanks in advance.
2012-05-08 12:29:10,308 | DEBUG | created
SCEP@1efb0be{l(/127.0.0.1:53827)<->r(/127.0.0.1:8161),d=false,open=true,is
I have a problem where messages seem to be getting stuck in a pending state.
Initially it seemed they only got stuck in this state if there was no
consumer when the message was sent, and even after a consumer was started,
they just sat there. They then seemingly caused all subsequent messages to
I get three of these threads created and deleted every 30 seconds or so. What
are these for? Why is a thread pool not being used? Might I be missing some
configuration?
-barry
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Task-thread-created-and-destroyed-tp4617
have a read of
http://fusebyexample.blogspot.com/2011/11/activemq-network-of-master-slave-broker.html
the key for you will be configuring the network connector between your
embedded broker and the ha pair.
On 7 May 2012 20:52, pollotek wrote:
> I am trying to make the following topology work w
in addition, most often, with a resolved issue, the resolution is
visible in the subversion commits tab, you can see the actual code
changes and commit comments. eg:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel#issue-tabs
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 04:55 -0700, dcheckoway wrote:
> Thank you!!
>
> I'm wondering if anybody can comment on whether KahaDB has been sped up in
> 5.6.0?
>
> In particular I found this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3309
> which apparently was resolved by:
> https://issues.apache.
Thank you!!
I'm wondering if anybody can comment on whether KahaDB has been sped up in
5.6.0?
In particular I found this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3309
which apparently was resolved by:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3467
...but neither of those tickets mentions a res
12 matches
Mail list logo
