Re: Does the jms vs amqp comparison article have any feedback from activemq?

Hi Do you have a link to the article? On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Sean K wrote: > Has anyone responded to this article written by Mark Richards about > AMQP and JMS (includes ActiveMQ)? > > Specifically: > > > "This means that message clients using AMQP are completely agnostic as > to whi

Does the jms vs amqp comparison article have any feedback from activemq?

Has anyone responded to this article written by Mark Richards about AMQP and JMS (includes ActiveMQ)? Specifically: "This means that message clients using AMQP are completely agnostic as to which AMQP clients API or AMQP message broker you are using." -- I remember hearing something like that

Re: 5.7 doesn't consume on queue

Yep, that's the case. There are incompatible changes around the DemandForwarding bridge and the expected behaviors: The subscriptions are created slightly differently. Among possibly other changes, this SVN revision is what changed that would cause the behavior specifically that you're seeing: htt

Re: 5.7 doesn't consume on queue

There seems to be an issue with the bridge getting established properly, probably due to the broker version mix and match. Like Torsten alluded to earlier, the subscription isn't set up properly on the client's $fBroker, ie, it doesn't see the subscription to the ACK queue coming from the server's

Re: 5.7 doesn't consume on queue

pBroker in this case isn't relative because it is used for intercommunication between server components. The server fBroker networking with the client fBroker is the issue. The network connector xx.xxx.x.xxx (i.e. 173.194.77.147) setting indicates the client fBroker IP to connect to. -- View thi

Re: 5.7 doesn't consume on queue

So I see two broker configs in activemq.xml: pBroker fBroker and I see one broker $fBroker in the jms.xml. I see the spring beans for the message listener container, and how it's listening on START and a JMSTemplate that will send to ACK. Is the connection factory pointin

Re: 5.7 doesn't consume on queue

activemq.xml is on server side which sends a message on the START queue to the remote broker defined by jms.xml and listens for ACK message. The server using the act

Re: 5.7 doesn't consume on queue

if you give enough info to recreate on our side, i can help. i need broker configs and any client side configs you have On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:20 AM, kureckam wrote: > This is over a networked broker and according to JMX the ack queue does > exist. I also tried using 5.6 and that too doesn't

Re: Web-console Exception: No broker is found at any of the 1 configured urls

Try adding this to your Resource declaration: Datasource = Related to this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-474 On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Christian Posta wrote: > Are you able to reliably get it to work without the ServerUrl param? > I am getting some race-like behavior w

Re: Web-console Exception: No broker is found at any of the 1 configured urls

Are you able to reliably get it to work without the ServerUrl param? I am getting some race-like behavior with TomEE 1.5+ and the Resource Adapter... still digging On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:57 AM, cristisor wrote: > Hi, > > I managed to reproduce the problem again and it's related to the > "Serv

Re: DefaultMessageListenerContainer start failure on remote connection

I'm just starting with Tomee+/ActiveMQ and I have no idea regarding the transports in my broker config. Are you talking about this: BrokerXmlConfig=broker:(tcp://localhost:61616)?persistent=false ? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DefaultMessageListenerCont

Re: Web-console Exception: No broker is found at any of the 1 configured urls

Hi, I managed to reproduce the problem again and it's related to the "ServerUrl" parameter from ActiveMQResourceAdapter. This version works: BrokerXmlConfig=broker:(tcp://localhost:61616)?persistent=false and this doesn't: BrokerXmlConfig=

DefaultMessageListenerContainer start failure on remote connection

Hello, I have a contextFactory and a topic inside a Tomee+ container and I'm trying to access them remotely, from an application located outside of the container but running in the same VM. remote application context.xml:

Re: Request/Response Model Not Working in Network of Brokers. Please Help

from your network connectors config, remove: b/c this is bridging all destinations as there are no excludes, so you have two paths to each broker which will complicate it a bit. On the ttl, this should be the minimum number of hops you require, I don't see why you want 6 in there. 3 or 2 should

Re: Request/Response Model Not Working in Network of Brokers. Please Help

Some points/observations: 1. Do you have NOB config for HA reasons only? Because if you are immediately consuming published messages, what's the benefit of paying the price of broker-to-broker message transfer.. there are other means to achieve availability and message durability without having to