thanks, but I get
INFO | Refreshing org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory$1@e553e814:
startup date [Thu May 08 14:20:33 CEST 2014]; root of context hierarchy
ERROR | Failed to load: class path resource [activemq.xml], reason: Line 44
in XML document from class path resource [activemq.xml]
I am just starting out learning ActiveMQ. We are running into issues with
JMS Queue Bridging. I looked at the JMS to JMS Bridge
http://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bridge.html Article, and the
Network of Brokers http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
Article. Both seem like
Thanks for your reply:)
I user Advisory Message to detect consumer join. When I would like to close
consumer(From Advisory Message or from Broker, not from consumer side). How
can I do?
--
View this message in context:
IMHO I have here one candidate
class ActiveMQConnection:
The method stop() is called on my stacktrace on the method close(), so first
try to close the ActiveMQ connection, then the transport (which is good).
The method stop() looks like this:
@Override
public void stop() throws
Hey,
Currently we use got 3 AMQ's spread over 3 different machines. We got it
setup so that AMQ A forwards (selective channels) to B which consumes. After
consuming (by Mule) it gets put back into B and B forwards to C. This works.
We use the following settings (this for example is for machine
Hi again,
I got some more time to dig into this, I found the place where It is
happening
I have here the sources for activemq-client 5.8.0.redhat-60024 (please note
that I'm using JBoss AMQ 6.0, this is a product released by RedHat that uses
internally Activemq 5.8.0)
The sources that I'm using
Hi all,
We are currently testing failover for our application in Jboss 7.2 with
HornetQ cluster active/passive in XA transacted mode. It seems like failover
works at random, but often we get the following error on the client side and
the one below on the server side. It seems to be stable when
Hello,
In ActiveMQ 5.x (I have tried 5.6.0 and 5.9.1), is it possible to use JMS
message selectors against in-flight messages that have been put on disk? Based
on my experimentation, it appears not, but I wanted to double-check, since I've
found conflicting information on the Web.
A comment
Setting decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority = true solved the problem.
Thanks again.
Regards
Laci
On 08.05.2014 07:42, Laci Gaspar wrote:
We have Network TTL=10 and decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority not set (so
it defaults to false)
So I'm going to try with decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority = true.