I am not even sure how to search for the answer to this question. So, if it
is a repeat; please send a link to the answer.
The question I have is: When a JMS Bridge is set up from Broker B to Broker
A and Broker B uses KahaDB to persist the Message, does ActiveMQ retrieve
the entire message first
logged with a possible patch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5211
boday wrote
> FYI, I was able to reproduce this issue…its because a queue with no name
> was created when using JMX to send messages in between queues...I'll log a
> ticket with more info...
--
View this message in
Durable topics (JMS) in full mesh of network of brokers kinda sucks right
now as you've seen. Some workarounds right now include evicting the durable
sub after some period of time, but that may not be suitable for all
solutions. I think given the nature of MQTT, we should reconsider some of
how thi
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5210
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:54 AM, surfnerd wrote:
> That would really useful feature for NB.
> Can you create JIRA for the same ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Concurrent-connections-with-sa
Thanks Christian. You are correct. C had connected to A before. The
scenario is that A and B are behind a load-balancer. When C connects
through a load balancer, it can be connected to either of the brokers. It
seems like VirtualTopics is a solution if subscribers can consume from
queues. For examp
Maybe we should have a default exception listener or something, especially
when using TX.
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:58 AM, phatcher wrote:
> I figured that out, my point is that the behaviour out of the box is
> broken -
> the AlwaysSendSync has the feel of someone adding some code to get arou
Could you use a throttling EIP?
http://camel.apache.org/throttler.html
Delayed messages are handled by ActiveMQ scheduling plugin:
http://activemq.apache.org/delay-and-schedule-message-delivery.html
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> What data structure does ActiveMQ use fo
Does C connect (or did it connect previously) to A to establish that
durable subscription on A? Or is that durable sub staying around somehow on
A?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Paddy Carman wrote:
> Seeking the experts help here.
>
> I have 2 brokers - A and B - connected as networks of brok
Can you elaborate? "cannot be processed by MDB" then out of delivery might
happen.
So you mean if the MDB fails and the message goes to DLQ?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Cserveny Tamas
wrote:
> Dear List!
>
> We experienced the following problem using JBoss 7 and ActiveMQ-RAR:
>
> In case a
For queues? Topics? Topic Subscriptions? Which objects are showing 0
dequeues?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Evan wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a problem, which I saw that the dequeues count always is 0 in Active
> MQ console.
> Can someone help me to explain that's why?
>
> And Can this problem cau
Your consumers are slow and you're trying to store everything in memory.
Check here for more info:
http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html
I've written in depth about what the memory management piece do here:
http://www.christianposta.com/blog/?p=273
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:10 A
That would really useful feature for NB.
Can you create JIRA for the same ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Concurrent-connections-with-same-clientid-to-networks-of-brokers-tp4681621p4681647.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble
If you'd like a complimentary copy of the article, feel free to contact me
directly.
*Raúl Kripalani*
Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
Integration specialist
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twi
13 matches
Mail list logo
