Are you able to reliably reproduce this in a standalone test
configuration? If so, does the same behavior happen if you change to a
dynamic network? (That is, does your staticBridge setting actually
contribute to the behavior?)
Tim
On Oct 14, 2015 1:22 PM, "fedemoya" wrote:
> I'm running two a
Um, that looks like Producer Flow Control kicking in, which would result in
warnings in the broker's logs. Is that what you're seeing?
On Oct 14, 2015 11:47 AM, "dhananjay.patkar"
wrote:
> I was able to capture a thread dump on the jvm on which consumers are
> vanishing.
> The threads are blocke
How many connections are in your connection pool?
On Oct 14, 2015 11:47 AM, "kal2" wrote:
> The FutureResponse becomes the bottleneck when we use more than 10 threads
> to
> send msgs out through connections.. We need to support large number of
> threads on producer side and they also send jms ms
Do your three clients use different clientIDs?
Also, it sounds like you're using durable subscriptions; is that accurate?
On Oct 14, 2015 11:44 AM, "wuwufen" <1767549...@qq.com> wrote:
> oh thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/use-mqtt-receive-
Thanks Glaucio , that was very valuable. Regards, - kiru
From: Glaucio Melo
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: Artermis user feedback
Hi Kiru,
We are performing some JMeter Test Plans over Artemis, Here's our numbers:
AWS server-si
I'm running two activemq 5.9.0 connected each other via a networkConnector
configured as static bridge (staticBridge=true).
I have also enabled the strictOrderDispatchPolicy in both brokers so i can
have total ordering on my topics.
Under this configuration and under heavy load sometimes the con
I recently added support for JAAS modules which utilize username/password for
authentication and authorization. See here [1]. Part of that work involved
importing the certificate JAAS module as well, but Artemis doesn't yet have all
the plumbing necessary to support it since it doesn't pass ar
On 10/14/2015 08:42 AM, pmularien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just wondering when the ActiveMQ NMS 1.7.1 build will be pushed to NuGet?
>
> Thanks,
> ~~ Peter
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-NMS-1-7-1-to-NuGet-tp4702942.html
> Sent from the Activ
I was able to capture a thread dump on the jvm on which consumers are
vanishing.
The threads are blocked on producer window, waitForSpace().
"Camel (CamelContext) thread #573 - JmsConsumer[RequestQueue]" daemon prio=6
tid=0x11ded000 nid=0x156c in Object.wait() [0x5b69d000]
java
Hi,
Hoping to get some advice on adding a security plugin to Artemis.
We are using an Artemis 1.1.0 broker.
Client systems post messages to a common queue and listen for messages on a
client specific queue.
There will be thousands of client systems.
Each client should be able to write to the
Hi Kiru,
We are performing some JMeter Test Plans over Artemis, Here's our numbers:
AWS server-side
- 3 Nodes m4.large -> @ CPUS and 4GB RAM, clustered through JGroups +
TCPGOSSIP as discovery server
- AWS small-type machine with JMeter as client
You can find our base Test Plan and the instructi
The FutureResponse becomes the bottleneck when we use more than 10 threads to
send msgs out through connections.. We need to support large number of
threads on producer side and they also send jms msgs, is there anything to
set that can help with this limitation.
pool-69-thread-4" - Thread t@734
Hi,
If I modify the example project: protocols/openwire/message-listener and
change the session to CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE and update onMessage to call
message.acknowledge(). If I terminate the process before it has acknowledged
the messages, then I get similar behaviour. The messages remain marked as
Hello,
Just wondering when the ActiveMQ NMS 1.7.1 build will be pushed to NuGet?
Thanks,
~~ Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-NMS-1-7-1-to-NuGet-tp4702942.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
We have an Artemis server (1.1.0) with a transacted consumer.
The consumer is an Apache Camel (2.15.2) route running in Karaf 3.0.4. We
are using the ActiveMQ 5.12.0 libraries.
Within the transaction, the message is marked as being delivered (i.e.
accessible from listDeliveringMessages), ho
oh thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/use-mqtt-receive-message-from-activemq-abnormality-tp4702931p4702932.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
when i use 3 or more mqtt client subscribe a topic in activemq,1 client is
unsubscribe the topic，1 is good running,1 is off-line.then i send message
to the topic,problem comes. when i unsubscribe the topic then subscribe ,i
whill receive the old message .i use a new mqtt client subscibe the
topic,
yes it should, Openwire is a work in progress and we're filling gaps in
its functionality. Could you raise a Jira?
On 14/10/15 13:47, slew77 [via ActiveMQ] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I modify the example project: protocols/openwire/message-listener and
> change the session to CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE and upda
I'd say the tried and true approach to handling out-of-space exceptions is
to prevent them from happening in the first place: set the storeLimit and
tempLimit to appropriately large values, enable PFC to ensure you don't
exceed them, and host them in a storage location that you can guarantee
will a
Wanted to ask if it is advisable to configure an IOExceptionHandler, such as
false
true
I could not find much information about this feature, besides
http://activemq.apache.org/configurable-ioexception-handling.html
Is this a tried and trusted approach to
20 matches
Mail list logo
