RE: Activemq HA without shared Database or Shared file system

Is replicated level DB store production ready now. -Original Message- From: James A. Robinson [mailto:j...@highwire.org] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:19 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Activemq HA without shared Database or Shared file system I'm not aware of any

Re: Activemq HA without shared Database or Shared file system

I'm not aware of any other choice. I initially tried to use the replicated leveldb system but ran into too many stability issues. On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 3:17 PM Natarajan, Rajeswari < rajeswari.natara...@sap.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Would like to know if ActiveMQ supports HA with message

Activemq HA without shared Database or Shared file system

Hi, Would like to know if ActiveMQ supports HA with message replication without the shared DB or shared file system I see that there is a replicated level DB store which requires a zoo keeper. Is there any other mechanism available other than these options where messages are getting

Re: Measures to improve the throughput

That seems very slow for a simple throughput test - my simple Camel tests have usually been in the 1000’s msgs/sec range. Can you share the full test? > On Mar 31, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Frizz wrote: > > In an atempt to improve the throughput of my system I did various

Re: ActiveMQ with KahaDB as persistent store becomes very slow (almost unresponsive) after creating large no (25000+) of Topics

The CountStatisticImpl class is basically just a wrapper for an atomic long. It's used all over the place (destinations, subscriptions, inside kahadb, etc) to keep track of various metrics in a non-blocking way. There's a DestinationStatistics object for each destination and that has several of

JMS to STOMP transformation causes throughput drop in STOMP consumers

Hi, I am trying to benchmark throughput for my nodejs consumer (STOMP). The producer is in Java sending JMS text and map messages. With text messages, I see that nodejs consumer is able to handle 10 Kmsgs/sec without any pending messages But when I send Map messages and using nodejs consumer

Re: ActiveMQ Object Message to json transformation not working

I think what it boils down to is figuring out where you need to put the jar to make it available to the class loader in the java instance that is running your broker. So, for example, on my Linux setup I have a directory /usr/share/activemq/lib that contains the jars needed to run ActiveMQ and

Re: ActiveMQ Object Message to json transformation not working

How do I make sure that this class is available at broker side? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Object-Message-to-json-transformation-not-working-tp4709447p4710145.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Measures to improve the throughput

In an atempt to improve the throughput of my system I did various tests. I started with a simple setup: - 1 Topic, non persistent - 1 Producer - 1 Consumer - Messge size: 4k - Active MQ 5.12.1 My system is reasonably fast (8 cores, 32GB memory, SSD) - still I only manage to send & receive about