Re: Message redelivery when producer broker killed (without persistence)

2017-10-12 Thread Justin Bertram
> So, am I just missing something or are virtual topics not a solution? I don't think virtual topics are a solution to your problem. Justin On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 6:08 PM, pypen wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to solve a problem and I am wondering if Virtual Topics provide > a solution for the pr

Message redelivery when producer broker killed (without persistence)

2017-10-12 Thread pypen
Hi, I am trying to solve a problem and I am wondering if Virtual Topics provide a solution for the problem. I have 2 brokers in a network of brokers. Broker A has a producer to VirtualTopic.Test and a local consumer Consumer.A.VirtualTopic.Test (lets call it consumer A). Broker B has a local consum

Running several instances of ActiveMQ behind a proxy/load balancer

2017-10-12 Thread sergii
Hi, So, I'm trying to have a failover setup for my ActiveMQserver at AWS. Actually, it should not really matter if it's AWS or not, I think my setup is generic. What I did was the following: - run two ECS tasks with ActiveMQdocker container - put an ELB (load-balancer) in front those two tasks -

Re: Unable to to consume all messages from queeue.

2017-10-12 Thread Tim Bain
For the logs you posted, they show no indication of any ActiveMQ-specific problem, so the initial question is really a Mule question (best posed to their mailing list, not ours): what does this particular Mule-specific log line mean, and what if anything does it indicate about the behavior of the u

Unable to to consume all messages from queeue.

2017-10-12 Thread gopi.k
Hi, In my source queue I have 100 messages I need t consume the messages one by one by using mule requester module but. only 3 messages are consuming and after that connector got disconnected and throwing the exception as follows. 2017-10-12 02:30:27,077 [[nyco-esb-retry-service].connector.

Re: How to put "properties" on a message so they are accessible later

2017-10-12 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On 11 October 2017 at 09:46, Matthias Hanisch wrote: > Hi, > > let me explain a similar use case what we would use to show that there is a > demand for modification of application properties: > > We would like to enrich an AMQP message with additional application > properties for better filtering