Hello,
Could anyone confirm my analysis or indicate if I'm doing something wrong here ?
Thanks!
Nicolas
-Message d'origine-
De : CASAUX Nicolas
Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2024 17:27
À : users@activemq.apache.org
Objet : RE: VirtualSelectorCacheBrokerPlugin - expiration of
would
be step #3 when the second selector would become active and the first selector
is deactivated.
Thanks,
Matt Pavlovich
> On Oct 21, 2024, at 4:58 AM, CASAUX Nicolas
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello !
>
> I have a question regarding the VirtualSelectorCacheBrokerPlugin
> mentioned
Hello !
I have a question regarding the VirtualSelectorCacheBrokerPlugin mentioned here
:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/virtual-destinations
If a consumer follows those actions in order:
1. subscribes to a queue "Consumer.consumer01.VirtualTopic.invoices" wit
Hello,
I’m still battling out with this memory issue, any chance that someone could
have a look at this ?
Thanks!
Nicolas
C2 – Usage restreint
De : CASAUX Nicolas
Envoyé : lundi 20 novembre 2023 09:38
À : users@activemq.apache.org
Objet : RE: [ActiveMQ Classic] Incorrect memory percent
Hello,
Any chance to confirm that this is an actual issue ?
The related side-effects seem important to me (selectors not applied because
messages on temp etc…)
Regards,
Nicolas
C2 – Usage restreint
De : CASAUX Nicolas
Envoyé : mercredi 15 novembre 2023 11:43
À : users@activemq.apache.org
7;s your system usage in conf/activemq.xml ? Are you using both persistent
and non persistent messages ?
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:45 PM CASAUX Nicolas <
nicolas.cas...@soprasteria.com<mailto:nicolas.cas...@soprasteria.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
&g
Hello,
I'm facing some memory problems with ActiveMQ "Classic" with VirtualTopics and
associated queues.
My scenario is this:
* I'm using ActiveMQ 5.17.6 on Windows
* I'm using vanilla config (so -Xms1G -Xmx1G)
* I have one virtual topic VirtualTopic.test
* I have 3 queues associ
FYI, I reproduced the case with ActiveMQ 5.17.4, I will open a JIRA tomorrow.
Nicolas
C2 – Usage restreint
-Message d'origine-
De : CASAUX Nicolas
Envoyé : mardi 4 avril 2023 17:59
À : users@activemq.apache.org
Objet : RE: Broker redelivery - NACK and authorization issue
Than
your unit
test and activemq.xml configuration.
Thanks,
Matt Pavlovich
> On Apr 4, 2023, at 9:24 AM, CASAUX Nicolas
> wrote:
>
> Hello ActiveMQ users,
>
> I have a question regarding ActiveMQ 5.16.x and redelivery of messages.
> I set up the broker with the configuration
Hello ActiveMQ users,
I have a question regarding ActiveMQ 5.16.x and redelivery of messages.
I set up the broker with the configuration described in paragraph “Broker
Redelivery” of page
https://activemq.apache.org/message-redelivery-and-dlq-handling .
The client “abc” of the broker has a read
87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C637865006108973538%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=I230hxkqq5AoGTPab7fEcFyeJURCYJjOIqQPNWfp05M%3D&reserved=0
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 8:39 AM CASAUX Nicolas <
nicolas.cas...@s
Hello,
I managed to successfully create a shared durable subscription using a
"client-id" and a "durable-subscriber-name" with the STOMP protocol.
However, always with STOMP, I can't find a way to create a shared non-durable
subscription. When I set only the "client-id", it does not seem to be
e to reference them in broker.xml (in ).
Justin
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:32 AM CASAUX Nicolas <
nicolas.cas...@soprasteria.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently configuring resource limits as specified here:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fa
Hello,
I'm currently configuring resource limits as specified here:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/resource-limits.html
I see that there is no possibility to use wildcard for the "match" attribute.
My question is: how could I set up those limits for all my us
those jar (and dependencies) identified and added in lib folder, I finally
managed to connect Artemis v2.20.0 with the remote Keycloak v16.1.1 :)
Please do not hesitate to let me know if this approach seems incomplete or
wrong! :)
Nicolas
C2 - Usage restreint
De : CASAUX Nicolas
Envoyé : jeudi
Hello !
I'm trying to use latest version of Artemis 2.20.0 to connect to a remote
keycloak, but so far I did not succeed. It seems that my keycloak is never
requested by Artemis.
I looked at the example provided here
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/main/examples/features/standa
.]
On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 10:37:52 +0100, CASAUX Nicolas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using ActiveMQ < classic > 5.16.0 and I have a question related to slow
> consumers.
>
> In my use case, I only use topics with non-durable messages. As per the doc,
entry in the
ActiveMQ.xml.
Regards
JB
> Le 8 févr. 2022 à 07:53, Simon Lundström a écrit :
>
> On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 10:37:52 +0100, CASAUX Nicolas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm using ActiveMQ < classic > 5.16.0 and I have a question related to slow
>
Hello,
I'm using ActiveMQ < classic > 5.16.0 and I have a question related to slow
consumers.
In my use case, I only use topics with non-durable messages. As per the doc,
the prefetchSize is 32767.
I have a constantPendingMessageLimitStrategy on this topic with a limit of 1000
messages.
I can
Well, it seems to work perfectly ! Even with admin user :)
Thanks a lot !
-Message d'origine-
De : CASAUX Nicolas
Envoyé : mercredi 24 mars 2021 14:24
À : users@activemq.apache.org
Objet : RE: ActiveMQ Artemis - resource limits - max-queues issue
I'll give it a try tonight an
#x27;t use it in production though
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:49 AM CASAUX Nicolas <
nicolas.cas...@soprasteria.com> wrote:
> Hello Clebert,
>
> I'm not set-up to build it from master, but I can wait for an "official"
> release, no need to build specific things for me
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:28 PM Clebert Suconic
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> you ok to build one from master, or should I prepare one to be downloaded?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 4:42 PM CASAUX Nicolas <
>>> n
;
> I'm sending a fix and I will provide you a snapshot to try it out.
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:14 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, let me run a test then.. let me work on it for 1 or 2 hours... brb
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:13 AM CASAUX
reload it upon
modification.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:43 AM CASAUX Nicolas
wrote:
>
> 1) I already tried with another user, but will retry to be sure.
> 2) If you were right about the "admin" user, I shouldn't have a problem when
> I set the value to 500. There'
ll belong
to admin. that means you won't be able to create any more than 3 queues, and
the broker.xml will already pass that limit.
Can you try with creating a new user to test this usecase?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 6:03 AM CASAUX Nicolas
wrote:
>
> I used the 2.17.0 version.
rsion ?
Regards
JB
> Le 23 mars 2021 à 11:00, CASAUX Nicolas a
> écrit :
>
> Hello JB,
>
> I did the test with a "fresh instance", so no queue were already created.
> And even when I set a "ridiculously" high value, I encounter the same issue.
> Tests were ma
ser already reach the queue numbers ?
Regards
JB
> Le 23 mars 2021 à 10:46, CASAUX Nicolas a
> écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently trying to set-up some resource limits with ActiveMQ Artemis. I
> have no problem with the "max-connections" limit, which works fine
Hello,
I'm currently trying to set-up some resource limits with ActiveMQ Artemis. I
have no problem with the "max-connections" limit, which works fine.
However, I cannot manage to use the "max-queues" resource limit. As soon I add
it in the broker.xml file, I can't subscribe to any address.
Ste
28 matches
Mail list logo
