ira/browse/AMQ-7008), it's an important
> > bottleneck.
> > I'm now evaluating different alternatives (what I have in mind is to
> > create a network of brokers dynamicOnly).
> > However, it depends a lot of your use case (persistent messages or not,
> > order of mess
g JDBC store, some using kahadb store).
>
> What's the filesystem ? EFS or "local" EC2 ?
>
> What's your current kahadb configuration in activemq.xml ?
>
> Just a note: 5.15.9 got major improvements on kahadb that could help.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 22/10
All,
I have a feed of 110 messages/second of about 150 bytes each which I'm
routing through a default-settings ActiveMQ 5.15.8 server and sending on to
a topic. Everything works fine until I set up a durable subscription, at
which point iostat (Ubuntu 18.04LTS) reports about 300tps and about 2-3
On 22/05/15 07:11, Leung Wang Hei wrote:
As in my 2nd last comment, iperf3 bandwidth testing shows a max bandwidth of
20Mbit/sec. This matches the expectation with the configured Traffic
Control.
Just want to check - is this the maximum bandwidth over a single TCP
session, or are you using
Hello
On 19/05/15 11:49, Leung Wang Hei wrote:
There seems to be an invisible barrier in the socket buffer for MQ network
bridge. We expect increasing tcp socket buffer size would give high
throughput but the outcome is not. Here are the test details:
- 2 brokers(A, B) bridged together over
Hi Tim
On 04/03/15 14:00, Tim Bain wrote:
Another question: is your consumer disconnecting and reconnecting, or
stopping and starting (and then connecting with the same client ID)? If
the former, I'm wondering if the client is telling the broker it already
has those messages when it reconnects
Hi Tim
On 28 Feb 2015, at 16:41, Tim Bain tb...@alumni.duke.edu wrote:
Are messages being sent to the topic at the time the consumer reconnects,
or is it just consuming a backlog of already-sent messages?
Yes, additional messages are being sent on to the topic when the consumer
reconnects -
Hello
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.10.1 running under OpenJDK 1.13.6. I'm
encountering a problem where I reconnect to a topic using a
subscriptionName, but no messages are dequeued.
Looking at the conversation in Wireshark:
* Client sends a CONNECT frame with a client-id
* Server sends a
On 22/07/14 14:33, James Green wrote:
I might have to add a ticket to get this included at the end of the build
pipeline given it is trivial to achieve and will aid adoption.
+1 for this - IIRC, Ubuntu and/or Debian already have .debs, but they're
a bit old, and I don't think they work
On 11/07/14 16:13, James Green wrote:
I cannot find a source of ActiveMQ Debian packages that are up to date. Is
there one?
We're trying to install all new servers using apt-get almost exclusively,
yet have the need of improvements in 5.9. Others in the company are noting
RabbitMQ does and are
On 10/05/14 11:09, Peter Hicks wrote:
I am not sure if this is an ApacheMQ or a Camel question, but I'm
experiencing the following issue in AMQ, so it's probably a good place
to start.
Follow-up for anyone interested - ActiveMQ doesn't include the HTTP
client library by default
All,
I am not sure if this is an ApacheMQ or a Camel question, but I'm
experiencing the following issue in AMQ, so it's probably a good place
to start.
There are several web servers I need to retrieve a single XML file from,
every 30 seconds. I want to publish this XML data on a topic for
Hello
According to http://activemq.apache.org/stomp.html, one sets
activemq.subscriptionName in a Stomp SUBSCRIBE frame when I want to be a
durable topic subscriber. However,
http://activemq.apache.org/stomp/stomp10/additional.html says I need to set
the durable-subscriber-name header.
The
All,
I have access to an ActiveMQ-hosted service publishing its data through Stomp.
There are five topics, and I want to subscribe to all five and re-queue
messages in persistent topics on my side, such that I can have multiple
subscribers internally accessing the data.
From the
14 matches
Mail list logo
