e for your
CI builds and avoid the issue altogether.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Shelley, Ryan wrote:
> Here's the actual stacktrace:
>
> 2011-01-18 04:36:25,488 [main] ERROR org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService
> - Failed to start ActiveMQ JMS Message Broker. Reaso
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1021)
-Original Message-
From: Shelley, Ryan [mailto:ryan.shel...@disney.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:11 PM
To: 'users@activemq.apache.org'
Subject: ActiveMQ and NFS mounts
I have a Continuous Integration system that runs on an NFS moun
I have a Continuous Integration system that runs on an NFS mount. I'm getting
errors about ActiveMQ not being able to obtain a lock, which I've seen before
in my code coverage tools, due to our NFS mount.
The only broker we have running during a CI test case is a VM broker, so I
tried appendin
I've been trying to go off the documentation on the ActiveMQ site, but having
some trouble.
I need to be able to start the a standalone instance of ActiveMQ using the Java
Service Wrapper, but pass it a custom config file. You can do this with the
non JSW with xbean:file but I don't see anythi
ach
> app starts an embedded broker, they all use same data directory,
> whichever has a lock on data directory is master, and clients (e.g.
> one app producer, the other consumer of the same topic) connect to
> whichever is active.
>
> Regards,
> Stevo.
>
> 2011/1/13 Shelley
mq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html - each
app starts an embedded broker, they all use same data directory,
whichever has a lock on data directory is master, and clients (e.g.
one app producer, the other consumer of the same topic) connect to
whichever is active.
Regards,
Stevo.
2011/1/
directory, and that we actually
configure base data directory, so both instances can use the same one,
but have to be given different broker name - it gets appended to the
base data directory path so they'll both have different data directory
within same data.
Regards,
Stevo.
On Thu, Jan 13,
I'm pretty green to ActiveMQ, but we're diving in and trying to get it to work
within our environment (ActiveMQ 5.2, Java 1.6, RHEL5). One issue we had, and
probably due to my incomplete comprehension of ActiveMQ, came about when we
tried running two webapps that both used local VM brokers. We
