Get local IP address of the client

2017-12-04 Thread czaban
Is it possible to get the current local IP of the client used to connect with broker? We have few active ip addresses in the same machine and the simple Dns.GetHostAddresses(Dns.GetHostName()) is not the solution. -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Bunch of connections to the same ActiveMQ server

2017-05-22 Thread czaban
Is there any optimization of the connections number based on singleton with URL connection string as a key or something similar mechanism to reduce number of tcp connection to the same ActiveMQ server? What will be the best approach to make it? -- View this message in context:

Re: NMS\Apache.NMS\tags\1.2.0 not working under Windows 2000

2010-03-02 Thread Czaban
Timothy Bish wrote: If you want to come p with a patch and attach it to a Jira issue we can take a look at it. On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Czaban c...@dgt.com.pl wrote: NMS\Apache.NMS\tags\1.2.0 used method form .NET .NET Framework 2.0 service pack 2 - windows 2000 can working

NMS\Apache.NMS\tags\1.2.0 not working under Windows 2000

2010-03-01 Thread Czaban
NMS\Apache.NMS\tags\1.2.0 used method form .NET .NET Framework 2.0 service pack 2 - windows 2000 can working with .NET .NET Framework 2.0 service pack 1 only - work around seems to be simply - please consider this problem. System.MissingMethodException: Method not found: 'Boolean

Re: ActiveMQ - how to makes it stable - don't care about performance - what is the best practise?

2009-11-03 Thread Czaban
? 4000 - what sort of message volume are you expecting? less then 1kb - what protocol will you be using? jms, stomp, etc..? openwire version 2 Best regards Piotr Czaban wrote: Hello, we would like to setup the instance of ActiveMQ 5.3 with the best factor of stability - we do not need high

ActiveMQ - how to makes it stable - don't care about performance - what is the best practise?

2009-10-24 Thread Czaban
Hello, we would like to setup the instance of ActiveMQ 5.3 with the best factor of stability - we do not need high performance at all. What is the best practice and configuration for this issue? Best regards Piotr -- View this message in context:

Re: Code C# form CVS and failover

2009-08-19 Thread Czaban
Connecting to: failover:(tcp://192.168.4.127:61616,tcp://192.168.2.206:61616)/RT at Apache.NMS.Tracer.get_IsDebugEnabled() in C:\Users\czaban\Documents\Visual Studio 2008\Projects\NMS\Apache.NMS\trunk\src\main\csharp\Tracer.cs:line 36

Re: Code C# form CVS and failover

2009-08-19 Thread Czaban
Post before was wrong, the AMQ client never has success - version form few weeks ago works fine. [NMS][Info]Connecting to: failover:(tcp://192.168.4.127:61616,tcp://192.168.2.206:61616)/RT [NMS][Info]Connecting to: failover:(tcp://192.168.4.127:61616,tcp://192.168.2.206:61616)/RT

Code C# form CVS and failover

2009-08-18 Thread Czaban
Hello, J made update of source code form repo and under Windows VS2008 J can not connect to any working server with uri using failover. Best regards Piotr -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Code-C--form-CVS-and-failover-tp25025704p25025704.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User