Hi Eric,
I think you and I have run into the same problem. Please check below.
Farshad
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-Queue-destinations-in-network-of-brokers-td25776018.html
Eric Van wrote:
ActiveMQ 5.3.0_SNAPSHOT (Sep 8th according to the snapshots listing)
I'm running
I have a network of 4 brokers configuration with
failover://(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616,...) defined. My first
piece of java code connects to one of these hosts (randomly) and puts some
messages in a queue destination (e.g. Document.QUEUE). A second piece of
java code connects to
the appropriate values
assigned to the networkTTL and dynamicOnly parameters.
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
farshad wrote:
I have a network of 4 brokers configuration with
failover://(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616
Hi Joe,
Thanks again for your reply. Do you know when 5.3 is going to be released?
-Farshad
Joe Fernandez wrote:
Hi Farshad,
You may have encountered the following problem:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2135
It is a rather nasty problem where messages become stuck
use an ActiveMQConnectionFactory which needs to be connected to a broker
URL specifically. So, if that broker is down do I need to try a different
broker myself or does ActiveMQ's failover would connect to a different
broker? If so, how?
Thanks,
Farshad
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi,
check
Hi,
I am new to ActiveMQ and am trying to use it in a distributed way. I
statically define my brokers as:
networkConnectoruri=static://(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616,tcp://host3:61616,tcp://host4:61616)/
And
transportConnector name=openwire uri=tcp://localhost:61616 /
I connect to host1