in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-Automatic-failback-does-not-work-tp4713190p4713231.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
yes, that's it.
It works now. I did not knew, that there is a correlation between acceptor
and connector.
Thank you very much
-Sebastian
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-Automatic-failback-does-not-work-tp4713190p4713231.html
Sent fro
me behavior.
>> I waited a couple of minutes, but the failback does not happen.
>> Instead both permanently post: AMQ212034: There are more than one servers
>> on
>> the network broadcasting the same node id.
>>
>> I'll send you my broker.xml files.
>>
t;
> Thanks in advance.
>
> -Sebastian
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-Automatic-failback-does-not-work-tp4713190p4713197.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
ks in advance.
-Sebastian
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-Automatic-failback-does-not-work-tp4713190p4713197.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt; But Master does not synchronize with Slave, and so the Slave does not do
> the
> failback.
>
> Does some know what I possibly could do wrong?
> Or is this a bug?
>
> -Sebastian
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-Automatic-failback-does-not-work-tp4713190.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
is this a bug?
-Sebastian
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-Automatic-failback-does-not-work-tp4713190.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
