this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source SOA
http://FUSESource.com
--
View this message
for not synchronising
access
to
this collection? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http
However, wouldn't static analysis of the code be sufficient in this case?
The code segment above is the only thing that is not protected by
synchronization, whilst
every other use of this collection is.
Static analysis can identify the problem and the fix, but it doesn't
protect the change
for not synchronising
access
to
this collection? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
to
this collection? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
access
to
this collection? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source SOA
http://FUSESource.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com
to
this collection? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source SOA
http://FUSESource.com
--
View this message in context:
http
, but...)
Is this an ommission or is there a reason for not synchronising
access
to
this collection? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer
should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http://blog.garytully.com
, but...)
Is this an ommission or is there a reason for not synchronising access to
this collection? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
to
this collection? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867250p21867250.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
to
this collection? If it's not a bug
then how should the consumer be disconnected?
Cheers,
Bonny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-while-closing-consumer-tp21867251p21867251.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 matches
Mail list logo