Well, in theory it should work because it appears to conform to the proper
syntax. That is, failover://(uri1,...,uriN)?TransportOptions
I gave it a quick try, and here are my results. Note that in your case, you
should have randomize set to false because you first want to connect via the
discover
Is it possible to use MultiCast for failover, but in the event that all those
brokers become unavailable, you would use a static ip address?
failover://(discovery:multicast://default,tcp://test.you.com:61616)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Failover--use-multicast%2C-then
