I took some more time out and found that this inconsistency was not because
of any change in KahaDB but because of change in physicalName of
AnyDestination from 0 to !0.
The commit refers to this JIRA issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5450
Hi Tim,
Did you got a chance to look at this?
Thanks,
Abhi
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/KahabDB-compatibility-issue-between-ActiveMQ-5-10-and-ActiveMQ-5-11-tp4692008p4696555.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I haven't, but what I would have done is grabbed the 5.11 code, walked
through it from the starting point you referenced till I figured out where
the value of 210 came from, then found that code in GitHub and looked at
the commit history to see who changed it, when, and why. You're completely
Hi Tim,
I don't have any specific idea as to what changed between the versions but i
can point you to the part of code that does it.
In my mulitKahaDB adapater configuration I have this entry:
amq:filteredKahaDB
I just looked through all the 5.11.x JIRA issues and don't see any that
describe this change outright nor any that I would have expected to require
making the change. Abhi, did you find the code change that causes the
change you describe? If so, can you see if the commit includes the number
of
Hi Abhi,
thanks for sharing your findings.
Did you find any documentation on this problem? Is this change accidental or
is there a reason?
Tom
--
View this message in context:
ActiveMQ has changed the name of the default persistent adapter from 0 to
#210 in ActiveMQ 5.11.1.
ActiveMQ v5.11.1 will not read messages from 0 directory as there is no
persistence adapter defined for that and hence they are kind of lost.
Thanks,
Abhi
--
View this message in context:
Hi Ahbi,
what is the result of your research?
Tom
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/KahabDB-compatibility-issue-between-ActiveMQ-5-10-and-ActiveMQ-5-11-tp4692008p4695628.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ping. Can some one please explain any changes in kahadb when moving from
ActiveMQ 5.10 to ActiveMQ 5.11?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/KahabDB-compatibility-issue-between-ActiveMQ-5-10-and-ActiveMQ-5-11-tp4692008p4692323.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ -
