re not using transactions or durable subscriptions.
>>>>>
>>>>> I set up a test between the two sites using the ActiveMQ
>>>>> Performance
>>>>> Module. I'm using a stock ActiveMQ 5.2 and the ActiveMQ Performance
>>>&g
t isn't a bandwidth limitation. The latency between the two
sites (measured using ping) is 90ms. Why would latency have such
a large
effect on my message throughput rate? Are there any settings I
could
change that would help my performance?
Thanks,
Nick Kleinschmidt
--
t; If I run the producer and consumer on another server in site 1, I get a
>>> system average throughput of 5184. If I run the same test, except with
>>> the client on a similarly configured server in site 2, I get a
>>> throughput of 112.
>>>
>>> The transf
>> The transfer rate between the two servers is upwards of 3 MB/s, so I
>> assume it isn't a bandwidth limitation. The latency between the two sites
>> (measured using ping) is 90ms. Why would latency have such a large effect
>> on my message throughput rate? Are there any settings I could change that
>> would help my performance?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nick Kleinschmidt
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Latency-causing-throughput-problems-in-ActiveMQ-5.2-tp25777286p25791255.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
so I
> assume it isn't a bandwidth limitation. The latency between the two sites
> (measured using ping) is 90ms. Why would latency have such a large effect
> on my message throughput rate? Are there any settings I could change that
> would help my performance?
>
> Thanks,
&
at would
help my performance?
Thanks,
Nick Kleinschmidt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Latency-causing-throughput-problems-in-ActiveMQ-5.2-tp25777286p25777286.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
