Re: [Artemis, AMQP] last-value queue question: nondestructive consumers

f...@gmail.com> Date: 30/04/2018 22:58 (GMT+00:00) To: > users@activemq.apache.org Subject: [Artemis, AMQP] last-value queue > question: nondestructive consumers > currently using Artemis 2.5.0 and AMQP in our tests > question in short: > is there an ability to force last-value

Re: [Artemis, AMQP] last-value queue question: nondestructive consumers

: [Artemis, AMQP] last-value queue question: nondestructive consumers currently using Artemis 2.5.0 and AMQP in our tests question in short: is there an ability to force last-value queue consumers to be non-destructive so the messages remain on the queue? a cool use case which we do in the QPID java

[Artemis, AMQP] last-value queue question: nondestructive consumers

currently using Artemis 2.5.0 and AMQP in our tests question in short: is there an ability to force last-value queue consumers to be non-destructive so the messages remain on the queue? a cool use case which we do in the QPID java broker is we create a last-value queue and in the broker we can con

Temporary queue question

Hi we have currently in production two active MQ server running in failover. We have 5 different applications that communicate through JMS. The client app they create a connection , a temporary queue and a producer (for the reply-request) and they use this connections and temporary queue f

distributed queue question

y are logically one queue, just distributed? If I don't do this, how do I get the reference of the remote queue. (I am not running in a JNDI environment.) Thanks for your help! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/distributed-queue-question-tf3843817s2354.html#a10885185 Sent fr

Re: Queue question

On 2/5/07, GaryG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GaryG wrote: > > > On 2/5/07, Givental, Gary wrote: >> Ah yes, I should have clarified that :) >> >> The nature of the applications makes that impossible. We need to >> ensure that A) all the tasks are processed in sequential order, B) >> each work ta

Re: Queue question

-grouping in other words? I'm also concerned about memory requirements and performance of the broker itself -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Queue-question-tf3157001.html#a8814454 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Queue question

d let all the individual workers compete on that queue, load balancing requests and dealing with failover of workers? -- James --- -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Queue-question-tf3157001.html#a8814319 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Queue question

turn on persistence. >> >> What am I missing? >> >> Perhaps I'm not grasping what persistence is and how it should work? I >> understand the messages persisted to a DB for backup, how is that >> different from journaling? If I want delivery assurance, even

Re: Queue question

at am I missing? >> >> Perhaps I'm not grasping what persistence is and how it should work? I >> understand the messages persisted to a DB for backup, how is that >> different >> from journaling? If I want delivery assurance, even if a consumer is >> down, >&g

Re: Queue question

rasping what persistence is and how it should work? I >> understand the messages persisted to a DB for backup, how is that >> different from journaling? If I want delivery assurance, even if a >> consumer is down, do I have to turn on DeliveryMode.PERSISTENT on the >> producer, AND use a DurableSubscriber on the consumer end? >> >> I appreciate any help! >> >> -GaryG >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Queue-question-tf3157001.html#a8769592 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Queue question

ork? I > understand the messages persisted to a DB for backup, how is that > different from journaling? If I want delivery assurance, even if a > consumer is down, do I have to turn on DeliveryMode.PERSISTENT on the > producer, AND use a DurableSubscriber on the consumer end? > > I

RE: Queue question

Subject: Queue question I'm doing some simple communication between two peers via a Queue, and I'm noticing odd persistence behavior. Even though both the producer is set with DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT, what I see happen is this: 1) Bring up AMQ broker 2) Bring up Producer and s

RE: Queue question

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:49 AM To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Queue question I'm doing some simple communication between two peers via a Queue, and I'm noticing odd persistence behavior. Even though both the producer i

Re: Queue question

? I appreciate any help! -GaryG -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Queue-question-tf3157001.html#a8755070 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Queue question

reciate any help! -GaryG -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Queue-question-tf3157001.html#a8755070 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.