Re: Why does having a staticallyIncludedDestination create a consumer?

2016-05-12 Thread Tim Bain
hat? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Why-does-having-a-staticallyIncludedDestination-create-a-consumer-tp4711832p4711861.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Why does having a staticallyIncludedDestination create a consumer?

2016-05-12 Thread exabrial
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Why-does-having-a-staticallyIncludedDestination-create-a-consumer-tp4711832p4711861.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Why does having a staticallyIncludedDestination create a consumer?

2016-05-11 Thread Tim Bain
other spoke to the hub, > the > > message from the first spoke will get forwarded to the new spoke even > > though > > no consumers have registered demand, and even odder yet, the hub shows > that > > two consumers now exist on the network. > > > > > &g

Re: Why does having a staticallyIncludedDestination create a consumer?

2016-05-11 Thread Christopher Shannon
at > two consumers now exist on the network. > > > I'm guessing that I'm misunderstanding how staticallyIncludedDestinations > works. Is there a way to forward the messages to the hub when it's > available, but store them locally if it's not? > > >

Why does having a staticallyIncludedDestination create a consumer?

2016-05-11 Thread exabrial
7;s not? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Why-does-having-a-staticallyIncludedDestination-create-a-consumer-tp4711832.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.