We've come across a problem in Camel 2.7.1 where Camel fails to start up
due to a TypeConverterLoaderException. This is a regression, as we've
had no such problem in Camel 2.5.0. Is this a known issue? Googling
around, I've found [1], which states:
My second problem is that it's current
Hi Willem,
We do not want to use a temporary queue for replies, because it is
scoped to the lifetime of the connection, and any data sent to that
queue will be lost if the connection gets lost for some reason.
We can't set the replyTo queue at route definition time because the
reply queue n
Hi Jim,
Claus give some inputs on the CAMEL-4008, one of his concern is letting
the user setting the ReplyTo property will cause some memory leak, as
camel-jms will start a jms listener per reply queue and only release it
when the camel context is shut down,
I don't know why you want to set
Hi Ashwin,
Thanks for the response. However, I don't think this is what I need as this
appears to simply be a queue to queue communication which I can already do
with ActiveMQ. My situation has a connection factory that looks like:
Hi,
Please check out the code below
Enjoy,
Ashwin...
--
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.springframewor
Some time ago someone wrote here about an actual SMTP listener component
for Camel, I think it was part of Apache James.
The project that made me interested in it got canned, so I don't know
whether it ever vecame usable.
Jim
On 26/05/2011 21:57, Donald Whytock wrote:
from("pop3://m...@emailh
from("pop3://m...@emailhost.com?password=password")
choice().when(header("subject").contains("keyword"))
to("jms://queuespec");
That's roughly the java. I think it can also be done in XML with no
java at all.
Don
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:11 PM, fachhoch wrote:
> I want an email listene
Hi,
I've created a black-box request/response facade around a Camel route. Think:
class BlackBox {
function process(request: Request): Response
}
This thing lives in a spring environment and is getting the
CamelContext injected. For each blackBox call, I use the context to:
1. Lookup an end
I want an email listener , ie whenever a new email arrives to a
particular inbox with a particular subject I want a jms message to be sent
to my listener , can camel do this ?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/email-listener-tp4429925p4429925.html
Sent
Again, just a follow up note, I simplified this in the end as in:
public class GetVehicleData extends RouteBuilder {
private String fromURI;
@Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from(fromURI).multicast(new
VehicleDataAggregator()).stopOnException()
Claus,
Just thought I would follow up.
I don't know if this counts as a contribution, but I ended up doing this as
a splitter as in:
from(fromUri)
.split().method(OuterZipFileDecompressingSplitter.class,
"split")
.streaming()
.parallelPro
Thank you Willem!
I changed the TCCL before creating the camel context and restored it after
the route was started - that did the trick.
Now, I wonder, is this really a good design? A properly designed OSGI
enabled component shouldn't use the TCCL right? Isn't that one of the big
problems when us
On 26/05/2011 17:15, Bruno Dusausoy wrote:
[...]
Hi Claus,
I've tried but I realized very soon that it is useless since the route
start with the cxfrs endpoint and immediately take the payload and tries
to unmarshall it, *before* hitting the validation component, making the
latter useless.
May
Have you tried to create the process like that
from(queue)
.process(new Processor() {
public void process(Exchange e) throws Exception {
String xml = (String) e.getIn().getBody();
InputStream
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, ext2 wrote:
> Hi, Claus:
> Yes you are right.
> The use case(header xml) isn't so widespread as the use-case( body xml)
>
> When we find the body is not xml(it's very easy to check), how about to give
> the user another chance to deal with header using in:header f
Charles Moulliard wrote:
>
> How have created your camelContext ?
>
The first route reads form a activemq queue. It receives the xml file and
create a processor giving him the message and its camelcontext.
So i do not need to create another camelcontext:
DynamicRouteHandler dynamicRouteHandler
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:44 PM, boday wrote:
> agreed...I'll update the patch. While we are at it, are there any other
> cases that should be addressed?
>
I wonder if BigDecimal has any similar NaN stuff?
>
> bvahdat wrote:
>>
>> I think that not only Double.NaN should be catched but also Flo
I'm currently investigating the integration of a local ActiveMQ with a remote
WebSphere MQ, with message sending and receiving to queues over (the IBM
concept of) sender and receiver channels. I've not found anything definitive
saying that it's possible and have yet to get a response to my posting
How have created your camelContext ?
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:10 PM, virgile.dev...@atosorigin.com
wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> the xml file that contains the route is dynamically created by an external
> webapp. I receive this file on a jms queue through an already started route.
> then this route
agreed...I'll update the patch. While we are at it, are there any other
cases that should be addressed?
bvahdat wrote:
>
> I think that not only Double.NaN should be catched but also Float.NaN.
>
-
Ben O'Day
IT Consultant -http://benoday.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context:
ht
Hi
Yeah we should cover all the NaN for the numeric types, both the
integers and the floating types.
I am sure Ben can add that last pieces for the floating types.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:31 PM, bvahdat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that not only Double.NaN should be catched but also Float.NaN.
>
On 26/05/2011 17:10, Claus Straube wrote:
Hi,
you can validate your xml payload with the validation component:
http://camel.apache.org/validation.html
Hi Claus,
I've tried but I realized very soon that it is useless since the route
start with the cxfrs endpoint and immediately take the paylo
Hi Charles,
the xml file that contains the route is dynamically created by an external
webapp. I receive this file on a jms queue through an already started route.
then this route gives the message to a processor that will load the route
from the xml file.
Charles Moulliard wrote:
>
> Hi Virg
Hi,
you can validate your xml payload with the validation component:
http://camel.apache.org/validation.html
Best regards - Claus
On 26.05.2011 17:03, Bruno Dusausoy wrote:
Hi,
I know this is a common question, but I couldn't find a simple answer
for this.
Basically what I want to do is to
Hi,
I know this is a common question, but I couldn't find a simple answer
for this.
Basically what I want to do is to validate the input of my RESTful web
service.
What I have is this camel context :
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring";>
uri="cxfrs:///?resourceClas
Hi Virgile,
Why do you load the routes like and not using by example as you have a
Spring XML File ?
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring";>
org.apache.camel.spring.config.scan
**/*Excluded*
**/*
or using a
Regards,
Charles Moulliard
Hello,
I try to load a route dynamically from an xml file with
camelContext.loadRoutesDefinition.
Works fine from my unit test but when i tried to run my bundle in
servicemix, i've got an error:
Caused by: javax.xml.bind.JAXBException: "org.apache.camel.model.config"
doesnt contain ObjectFactory.cl
camel-cxf endpoint will try to use the TCCL to load the class which you
specify from the URI with serviceClass option.
If you are using spring extender to load camel route, spring will set
the TCCL with the bundle class loader and it has no trouble to load the SEI.
As you are using iPOJO to injec
Willem,
Can you explain that a bit? Should I change the thread context classloader
prior to creating the camel context? I don't quite understand.
/Bengt
2011/5/26 Willem Jiang
> Maybe you need to set the thread context classloader with the classloader
> which loads the SEI class.
>
>
> On 5/26
Maybe you need to set the thread context classloader with the
classloader which loads the SEI class.
On 5/26/11 8:50 PM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
Willem,
I don't "load" my camel context, I create it programmatically like this:
*CamelContextFactory factory = new CamelContextFactory();
fa
Hi Bengt,
I think you should create the cxf endpoint using the JaxWsServerFactoryBean
like described below:
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-ws-java-first-with-jms-transport.html
So you just use another address than in the example there.
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: bengt.ro
Willem,
I don't "load" my camel context, I create it programmatically like this:
*CamelContextFactory factory = new CamelContextFactory();
> factory.setBundleContext(bc);
> CamelContext context = factory.createContext();*
I get the bundle context (bc) from iPOJO when my component is
Thanks for you reply Christian,
Yes, I did find your article but I guess I didn't understand it correctly...
When you say I should create a "normal cxf endpoint" I thought I was
supposed to create a route starting with "from("cxf:")" but maybe you mean I
should actually do a
"new CxfEndpoint()"?
Hi,
I'm not sure how do you load the camel context.
camel-cxf bundle don't need to import your customer SEI package, you
just need to make sure you thread context classloader can load the SEI
class.
On 5/26/11 7:19 PM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
Hello again Willem,
Yes the ITrsWebService class is
I think you can do the CamelTransportfactory setup a little simpler and
the route is wrong.
A long time ago I wrote an article about the Camel transport for cxf but
it should mostly still be valid:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Better+JMS+Transport+for+CXF+Webservice+using+
On 26 May 2011 12:57, Jim Talbut wrote:
> On 26/05/2011 11:51, James Strachan wrote:
>>
>> Also we don't need to rewrite camel-web just to provide support for
>> multiple contexts; all thats really required is one or two resource
>> beans using the OSGi or JMX API to discover the contexts and a
>>
On 26/05/2011 11:51, James Strachan wrote:
Also we don't need to rewrite camel-web just to provide support for
multiple contexts; all thats really required is one or two resource
beans using the OSGi or JMX API to discover the contexts and a
template page or two and multiple contexts could be sup
Christian,
I tried using the camel transport but I got the same exception (couldn't
find the ITrsWebService class). I'm not sure I did it the way you intended.
What I did was this:
*/*
** * Initialize camel transport for CXF
** */
**BusFactory bf = BusFactory.newI
Hi,
I think that not only Double.NaN should be catched but also Float.NaN.
If you add the following lines in ObjectConverterTest the test will fail:
assertEquals(null, ObjectConverter.toFloat(Float.NaN));
assertEquals(null, ObjectConverter.toLong(Float.NaN));
So that I think tha
Hi Claus,
I tried what you said with the synchronous=true option but it doesn't seem
to work either.
I put that option to all the nmr routes in the test project but it's the
same result.
Is there anything I missed?
This is what I modified:
camel-context.xml from the endpoint
http://camel.apache.o
This sounds like a new angle. Do you have any pointers as to how I do this?
Does it limit what I can do with CXF or is it "fully featured"?
/Bengt
2011/5/26 Christian Schneider
> You might want to try the camel transport for cxf instead.
> I think in this case you do not need spring.
>
> Christ
Hello again Willem,
Yes the ITrsWebService class is actually part of the bundle that contains
the route and its package is exported. When I use Spring with "cxf:bean", as
I described earlier, Spring seems to have no problem finding this interface.
However, I cannot see that the camel-cxf bundle i
Thanks for your answer Willem, however I'm not exactly sure what you mean...
Do you mean that if I use "cxf:bean" then the enpoint (and camel context)
must be created by Spring? Can I not use "cxf:bean" without using Spring?
I want to create the endpoint bean using normal java code - is that
poss
You might want to try the camel transport for cxf instead.
I think in this case you do not need spring.
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: bengt.rode...@gmail.com [mailto:bengt.rode...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von
Bengt Rodehav
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2011 12:17
An: users@camel
Hi Jim,
I also am just another plain Camel user.
OSGi and multiple contexts: This is obviously a prime motivation. We
need to view and observe the details of multiple Camel Contexts
contributed by multiple bundles. The spring extender binds
ApplicationContext objects as OSGi services - we want to
On 5/26/11 6:16 PM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
* ITrsWebService serverBean = new TrsWebServiceImpl();
> from("cxf:
>
http://localhost:9001/trsws/?serviceClass=se.digia.trs.route.webservice.ITrsWebService
> ").bean(serverBean);*
But for some reason camel-cxf can't seem to find the ITrsWebServ
Hi,
cxf:bean: will use the spring to configure the cxf endpoint.
You may use URI to specify the cxf endpoint, but you can't configure the
interceptors or features which are usually configured by spring.
On 5/26/11 6:16 PM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
* ITrsWebService serverBean = new TrsWebServiceI
I agree with everything Jim just said :)
So I'm sure we can trim the size down. e.g. we don't really need the
scala compiler for deployment; we can compile all the templates at
build time (though its very handy using it at development time for
rapid reloading of templates as you edit them on the f
I have great problems getting camel-cxf to work. I use Camel 2.7.1 running
in Karaf 2.2.0.
First, lets see what I can get to work...
If I create my camel context and my cxf endpoint from within Spring I do get
things to work, like this:
*META-INF/spring/beans.xml*
...
*http://localhost:9000
Tarun,
I'm just another user, but I've recently been trying to turn camel-web
into something that suits my needs.
There are certainly problems with camel-web, but I'm not convinced that
Tarun's heading in completely the right direction.
The two big problems with camel-web for me are:
1. I u
Hello,
a simple solution may be to use the .session file as a trigger for your
routes. The ftp component waits for the .process and then launches your
route with a custom processor on the files. Depending on your needs you may
treat the files as one unit inside different processors or split them li
Is it possible to instantiate a jdk proxy based on the interface of the
service? If so, the code would be cleaner because there will no dummy service
implementations?
Best Regards,
Sergey Zhemzhitsky
-Original Message-
From: Willem Jiang [mailto:willem.ji...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday
As the CXF RS need to instantiate the resource class to navigate the
resource. That is why we need the serviceClass to be class instead of
interface.
On 5/26/11 3:37 PM, Zhemzhitsky Sergey wrote:
Hi Willem, Ben
Thanks for the information.
I tried to use the interface instead of class in the s
Hi Willem, Ben
Thanks for the information.
I tried to use the interface instead of class in the serviceClass attribute and
I didn't succeed because of an exception that told that the class is required.
Here is the exception:
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Resource class interface
org.te
54 matches
Mail list logo
