Hi,
It is more like CXF issue than an Camel issue.
It looks like there are some WS policy relate issue in you application.
Did you double check the WSDL and cxfEndpoint related configuration ?
Did you have chance to invoke the service by using normal CXF client ?
--
Willem Jiang
FuseSource
We
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Taariq Levack wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, the CBR is rightly based on content, I think you want the recipient list
> [1].
>
> [1] http://camel.apache.org/recipient-list.html
>
Yes that is a good EIP. There is also some of the dynamic ones like
dynamic router, routing sl
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:39 PM, santoshjoshi
wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> I made some changes to existing API (camel 2.8.7), as well as created some
> test cases for this feature.
> I want to contribute this to Apache Camel, It would be great if Apache Camel
> Team reviews the changes and provide valua
Thanks Christian,
The patch has been attached to Jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5521
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5521
Regards
Santosh
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/File-Component-Rename-an-existing-file-tp5716075p5717736
It looks you didn't install the the camel-blueprint bundle rightly?
Can you double check it ?
--
Willem Jiang
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com (http://www.fusesource.com/)
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
(English)
http://jnn.javaeye.co
Yeah, you can call the external API in a processor to setup the headers which
could be use by the recipient-list to implement the CBR.
--
Willem Jiang
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com (http://www.fusesource.com/)
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
sorry for the newbie question, i'm getting the following from a basic
producer using CXF within Camel... any hints would be greatly appreciated!
org.apache.cxf.interceptor.Fault: None of the policy alternatives can be
satisfied.
at
org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.AbstractPolicyInterceptor.hand
You can set this as exchange property or message header befor you split the
message. Than you have access to this information in your custom splitter...
Best,
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 20.08.2012 16:58 schrieb "Murari Raghavan" :
> Hello:
>
> Is there a way to pass arguments to a cu
Could you attach it as diff to the JIRA issue Claus created? And don't
forget to grant the license to Apache...
Best,
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 20.08.2012 19:40 schrieb "santoshjoshi" :
> Hi Claus,
>
> I made some changes to existing API (camel 2.8.7), as well as created some
> test
I think this is a good choice.
Best,
Chrostian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 20.08.2012 22:16 schrieb "ceposta" :
> suppose i could have asked this before i started… but i'm almost done with
> a
> dzone refcard for most-used camel components and their configs. I wanted to
> limit it to 6 componen
suppose i could have asked this before i started… but i'm almost done with a
dzone refcard for most-used camel components and their configs. I wanted to
limit it to 6 components, and I chose:
JMS/ActiveMQ
CXF
HTTP4/Jetty
Direct/Seda
Mock/Test
Any comments? Are there any glaring ones that should h
Hi Claus,
I made some changes to existing API (camel 2.8.7), as well as created some
test cases for this feature.
I want to contribute this to Apache Camel, It would be great if Apache Camel
Team reviews the changes and provide valuable feedback/comments.
could you please tell where and how shoul
Hi
Yes, the CBR is rightly based on content, I think you want the recipient list
[1].
[1] http://camel.apache.org/recipient-list.html
Taariq
On 20 Aug 2012, at 18:09, gilboy wrote:
> Hi
>
> The content based router does not appear to support the routing of a message
> to a particular destin
Hi
The content based router does not appear to support the routing of a message
to a particular destination based on a call to an external API. The examples
I have looked at appear to support the routing of messages to a destination
based on the message content.
In a nutshell, I want to use a Con
Dear All,
Today, I tried to deploy a simple route in Websphere Application Server 8.5
as an Asset (.eba file).
However, while deploying the asset, I got the following error:
org.apache.aries.application.modelling.ModellerException: CWSAL0126E: An
exception occurred while modelling bundle ib-base
Hello:
Is there a way to pass arguments to a custom splitter?
For eg - Route Builder calls a custom splitter -
DDSResponseSplitService.splitStatusResponse()
from(routesprops.getString(Constants.INBOUND))
.split().method(DDSResponseSplitService.class, "splitStatusResponse")
.process(new
I'm using Camel 2.8.5, and am finding that messages sent to SEDA endpoints
that have polling consumers are sometimes lost - when sending more than 1000
messages.
My example scenario is shown below. I have a timer endpoint to kick off my
experiment. The route then proceeds as follows:
- Generate
Thanks for the hint Claus! I constructed the endpoint uri before sending
the message to the queue in the header and then using the
recipientList(header("header name").
Thanks again,
Raheem
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Claus Ibsen-2 [via Camel] <
ml-node+s465427n5717679...@n5.nabble.com> wrot
Hi
I logged a ticket to get such a feature into Camel
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5521
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I actually don't think this would be possible. I don't recall we have
> a hook to allow a custom plugin on the producer side, to eg
I asked this same question before and this the example and answer I got about
using a Map with Jackson.
I did not test it to confirm that it works correctly though.
On Aug 20, 2012, at 1:08 AM, Claus Ibsen
mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi
Maybe we could improve the cam
Yeah, I also favor to use
to("bean://myBean?method=foo")
which you can intercept...
Best,
Christian
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Łukasz Dywicki
> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > Is there a way to intercept custom processor execution?
> >
> >
Hi
What version of Camel are you using?
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Hilde wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I have figured out that onCompletion().onWhen() cannot be used multiple.
>
> Actually onCompletion().onWhen() suggests to use it multiple erroneously.
> I wrote the following route:
>
> from(
Hi
Maybe we could improve the camel-jackson to support list/map types as
responses more easily?
I just wonder what a good solution would be?
Either the user would need to explicit configure this on the data format?
Or we can look into a fallback type converter, so Camel automatic an
convert to a
Thanks Claus
Now I think i have to use some thing else intead of aggregator as i cant
upgrate the version.
Thanks for your valuable support and time.
Neeraj Mahajan
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Aggregator-not-propagating-exception-back-in-camel-version-1-
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Neeraj Mahajan
wrote:
> I have intentionally disabled the error handlling, As I *required the message
> to be redelivered* in case of any exception/error in any route. I have
> applied transaction policy in my root route(not shown here in the above code
> sniphet)
I have intentionally disabled the error handlling, As I *required the message
to be redelivered* in case of any exception/error in any route. I have
applied transaction policy in my root route(not shown here in the above code
sniphet) from where this splitter and aggregator gets called.
Thanks
Nee
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:51 AM, javakurious wrote:
> I am looking for some tips to correctly use Aggregator component.
>
> The scenario is that I am getting a request in xml format, and I process
> that request and get a response in XML format as well. But the request and
> response are two compl
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Neeraj Mahajan
wrote:
> Once aggregated result(exchange) is commited, the control does not come back
> to the aggregation strategy. And also I dont want to handle the exception, I
> need it to be progagated back from the aggregator component.
>
You have disabled e
28 matches
Mail list logo