Hi
This is not supported; and its not easy doable as its an API breaking
to pass in any route information as a new parameter to the
interface(s).
You can create a generic filter and setup a number of filters with the
route id configured.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:42 AM, helmut.at
Please excuse my poor description of the problem.
Second try:
In my application I would like to implement a filter for a file consumer,
like that:
I plan to code a general filter for all/some of my routes.
In the filter method I do in the first run something like this:
No problem so far.
But now
Hi
When the message send to the queue, it will marshaled as a stream.
And you will get a copy of it from the queue, so when you change the original
message headers, it will effect the message which you already send to queue.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
We
Hi
Using the payload should work for you, as camel-cxf is try to understand the
request.
I'm not sure how do you configure the ws-security on the camel-cxf endpoint,
but it could easy to configure a generic ws-security interceptor[1] if you
don't relay on wssecurity-policy[2].
[1]http://cxf.ap
I don't think I (and other users) understand what you try to do. Could you
share an example with us?
Best,
Christian
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:07 PM, helmut.at.work wrote:
> appreciated
I will debug some more and respond later in the day. It doesn't aways
fail with an exception. Often, it just stops processing more messages and
I think that is because the javascript expression is failing to return
true. The javascript expression is what is setting the headers for
correct pagina
Which exception did you get? Can you share the stack trace?
Which Camel version do you use?
Best,
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 04.12.2012 11:40 schrieb "Jason Chaffee" :
> I take that back. It worked one time, but not the next time. However, my
> hack works with every run.
>
>
>
> On
No.
Best,
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 03.12.2012 21:32 schrieb "samslara" :
> Hello,
> Is there a way from within a Processor to get a reference to the
> connection that was used to connect to the broker to fetch the jms message?
> For example in the given route:
>
>
>
>
> Is ther
Hi,
I got 2 separate projects, the project1 is an osgi component that start a
CamelContext with routes and use a dynamic recipientList(). On project2, I
call addRecipient(Endpoint endpoint) from project1's exported service.
In project1, my route is like this :
from(sedaEndPointURI
Hi All,
We have a route to get a set of files being processed together, that are
prepared by different processes asynchronously. In order to flag the start,
we will put a doneFile to flag all the files are ready to be processed.
However, once a while we found some of the files are left there whi
Hi,
Thank you very much, as you said doing that the threads are cleaned up :) I
should have tried that before, my apologies ...
I'm sorry to bother you, but after using that approach and consuming files
intensively I have seen that sometimes the consumerTemplate cannot be
stoppped, and, in that
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:18 PM, prueegg wrote:
> Is it somehow possible to configure xstream as object serialization instead
> of the java serializiation?
>
> In my project I have various Object Messages to transfer over JMS. By
> default the Obects are serialized with the Java serialization.
> Of
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:55 PM, swwyatt wrote:
> When the SFTP component writes a file, does it use the
> 'camelExclusiveReadLock' extension or is this just for consumer?
>
Just for consumers. They are read locks, and all apply for consumers only.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> htt
When the SFTP component writes a file, does it use the
'camelExclusiveReadLock' extension or is this just for consumer?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camelExclusiveReadLock-tp5723619.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is it somehow possible to configure xstream as object serialization instead
of the java serializiation?
In my project I have various Object Messages to transfer over JMS. By
default the Obects are serialized with the Java serialization.
Of course I could configure the route to do marshalling and u
I see that this one refers to a wsdl in the configuration.
Would it be feasable to build a generic one that do not need to
configure the wsdl.
I'd like to build a generic soap router and route based on the
contents of a soap header.
I tried using CXF in payload and/or message mode, but it either fa
Hi Claus,
we are having a similar problem.
Our configuration is:
- Camel 2.10.1
- ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> In Camel 2.9 you can use replyToType=Exclusive, which would then not
have this leak.
We cannot use replyToType=Exclusive because we are using a cluster
environment, so we have to use shared rep
Did you remove the call of mockEndpoints();?
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
(English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (http://jnn.ja
Hi,
Please take a look at this example[1]
[1]http://camel.apache.org/cxf-proxy-example.html
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
(English)
In that case, you should first start routeB, so that when routeA
starts its .to("direct:routeB") points to valid consumer in routeB
Bilgin
On 4 December 2012 12:51, vishalad wrote:
> I am sorry, it's a typo mistake, route B should be read as
>
> public class B extends RouteBuilder{
> @Override
>
Hi
We need to redirect the SOAP request body received from the client side to
the external web service(External server). Can anyone suggest which camel
component to be used and is it possible to implement in JAVA DSL?
Suggest/Mention some suitable example for the same
Here i attached a sample cod
I am sorry, it's a typo mistake, route B should be read as
public class B extends RouteBuilder{
@Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from("direct:routeB")
.process(new Processor() {
@Override
public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {
The problem is that I'm consuming through sftp.
My problem is that I see that the thread count is increasing with the
template and the dynamic routing solution.
As the unused endpoint after it consumed the file not free up. I've
experienced this with the consumer template as well.
Is there a way
Do you have a camel context file to start your routes?
is route B started in there?
To me it seems the configure method of route B is never called
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
> Hi Vishal,
>
> routeB doesn't seem correct to me. At the end of the route, you are
> callin
I take that back. It worked one time, but not the next time. However, my
hack works with every run.
On 12/4/12 1:50 AM, "Jason Chaffee" wrote:
>If I use String.class instead of Integer.class it works. It could be an
>issue with my javascript why the Integer.class didn¹t work.
>
>
>
>On 12/4
Hi Vishal,
routeB doesn't seem correct to me. At the end of the route, you are
calling again the same route: to("direct:routeB")
Any reason for that?
Bilgin
On 4 December 2012 07:25, vishalad wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a route A which is timer based route and gets invoke at server
> startup. I
If I use String.class instead of Integer.class it works. It could be an
issue with my javascript why the Integer.class didn¹t work.
On 12/4/12 1:20 AM, "Jason Chaffee" wrote:
>Tried that, but for some reason it fails to give me the expected results
>as it stops processing after 18,000 records
Tried that, but for some reason it fails to give me the expected results
as it stops processing after 18,000 records whereas my "hack" finishes
correctly after 34254 records.
On 12/3/12 11:23 PM, "Christian Müller"
wrote:
>Indeed, this is clunky... ;-)
>You should be able to do
>ns.xpath("/soa
Tried that, but for some reason it fails to give me the expected results
as it stops processing after 18,000 records whereas my "hack" finishes
correctly after 34254 records.
On 12/3/12 11:19 PM, "Willem jiang" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>You should be able to set the xpath expression result like this
>.se
29 matches
Mail list logo
